the answer is :
63t^2 - (35 +54)t + 30
your answer is correct
2007-03-02 19:43:36
·
answer #1
·
answered by gjmb1960 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Im sorry but that is what i come up with in the equation as presented
30-89t+63t^2
2007-03-03 00:35:27
·
answer #2
·
answered by Dave aka Spider Monkey 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
My calculations show:
= (-6 + 7t)(-5 + 9t)
= + 30 - 54t - 35t + 63t²
= + 30 - 89t + 63t²
2007-03-02 22:15:30
·
answer #3
·
answered by Brenmore 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
= 30 - 54t - 35t + 63t²
= 63t² - 89t +30
This is the answer obtained from question as given.
2007-03-02 22:21:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by Como 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Who told you it was 93-89t?
If that answer was in a book, it is a misprint.
2007-03-02 19:44:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by smartprimate 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Your first answer is the correct one. Someone ignored the t² and added the 63 and 30 to get 93. That is not, repeat, not correct.
2007-03-02 19:53:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by Helmut 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
(- 6 + 7t)(- 5 + 9t) =
30 - 89t + 63t²
- - - - - - - - - - - -s-
2007-03-02 23:33:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by SAMUEL D 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
it is like to say 2x2 is not equal to 4. trust yourself
2007-03-02 23:19:33
·
answer #8
·
answered by reza 2
·
0⤊
0⤋