English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

and receiving gifts from muslim countries

2007-03-02 18:26:20 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

19 answers

The Americans refuse to put their citizens under the jurisdiction of foreign courts (example: the European Court of Human Rights in Den Hague) so why the hell should Prince Charles be answerable to the US Supreme Court?

Besides, it is not against any law to be pro - Islamic, nor is it a crime to exchange gifts. There is a law against supporting terrorism however. You are making the basic mistake of implying that to be a Muslim is to be a terrorist.

Somebody who you may like to investigate though is President Bush and his close links to the Saudi royal family.

2007-03-02 18:42:27 · answer #1 · answered by 13caesars 4 · 3 0

the first theory that got here to my ideas upon studying this submit become a million. WHY is college training fee is united statesa. ridiculously intense priced? WHY do colleges opt for a lot funds? a college isn't a company like Apple or Microsoft. My sister will graduate from her 4 years of faculty quickly and the completed coast of training pee paid for the period of those 4 years....is OMG too a lot. the quantity is quite virtually as a lot because the U.S. nationwide debt. 2. do colleges extremely opt for a great number of money? 3. united statesa. is at present dealing with an economic disaster; that is envisioned to be between the worst ever in U.S. historic previous. So unemployment is a starting to be challenge, the commercial gadget is getting spoiled and there are extra innocuous voters suffering under the poverty line. and that i'm no longer antagonistic to the authorities although the federal authorities doesn't look sorting it out properly. i don't understand that a lot about the ecnonomy, so I discovered from my sister (she's a company / economics significant) and that i visit inform that the rustic, the commercial gadget etc are all dealing with a disaster. Soo....i don't understand yet except the authorities substances to love help the undesirable pay for faculty or something I strongly advise that schools do no longer improve training expenses. otherwise...united statesa. will face a good worse academic disaster. Does the stuff I typed make sense? wish it does. And......the solid information is that the intense priced training fee paid to an magnificent college become easily properly worth it considering my sister were given an magnificent pastime 2 weeks earlier commencement.

2016-11-27 01:32:54 · answer #2 · answered by steffi 4 · 0 0

I think he should providing Bush, Cheney, Blair, Thatcher, Rumsfeld, Rice, Powell, Bush Snr., and all the other slime bags who kow-tow to the Saudis wihile looking the other way as the ruling family subsidises Islamicist violence> A perfect example is Indonesia, where huge amounts of money are funnleled into fake charities, schools and trussts, especially ultra-low fee Islamic schools to attempt to change an entire nation's religious, cultural, political and social beliefs (most Indonesians DON't wear head-scraves,m like skimpy clothes, drink, gamble (like mad), and believe Islam is simply the requiorement one ,ist have to fulfill the regulations required to comply with having a passport.ID card (KTP)). I know I've lived there and heard many horror stories about Arabs funding Islamic extremists- specially Saudis, Bahraini's and Omani's.
Jamaal Islami'yah is not an Indonesian concept- it is an Islamic one.

2007-03-02 23:09:43 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I am no monarchist but why should any one go to the U S to stand trial for not commiting a crime and not in the U S. You are the kind who would have actively supported the Spanish inquisition and helped to build the fires around those found guilty of disagreeing with the diktats of the papacy.

2007-03-06 06:56:53 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Have you studied government? The Supreme Court is essentially a court of review, which has most limited jurisdiction, and certainly no jurisdiction over titled persons who are citizens of other countries, with no actions pending. Where do you suggest this power is delineated in the Constitution?

2007-03-02 18:37:19 · answer #5 · answered by sochiswim 4 · 4 0

If that is the case what about the British and American tourist

who go to Muslim

countries on Holiday and help in funding the terrorist by buying

gifts and souvenirs, eating in restaurants owned by Muslims

should, THEY be held to account also?.

2007-03-02 21:34:18 · answer #6 · answered by st.abbs 5 · 0 0

Just take a good hard look at the animal behavior of the Taliban. These are the people of Islam who at every level oppress every movement of their own people to advance into the modern world! They follow, worship, endorse the ancient creeds action and ways of the so called Prophet Mohammad. What a truly awful animal he must have been, wherein men today would harken back to his way of life and teachings etc.

If any member of the UK crown should be called to account then it should be Queen Elizabeth II!

Sovereign of The UK & Head of the Church.

The ***** who went barefooted into an Islamic Mosque in London, and in so doing, thus endorsed the creation of the UK Council of Muslims, wherein they now run riot and demand every pursuit of their evil indoctrination be acceptable to the UK without any impediments whasoever.

2007-03-02 18:57:25 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

So you want to prosicute him for defending a religion and accepting gifts whilst on an official visit. Hmmmm I think the majority of Amerricans have more sence than to pull this one.

2007-03-02 22:50:04 · answer #8 · answered by Mikey C 6 · 0 0

The United States has no jurisdiction in other countries. We might like to think we are the "world police" but that doesn't mean we can force our laws one someone else. Besides, there is a thing called the FREEDOM OF SPEECH! STOP TRYING TO SUBVERT THE CONSTITUTION! YOU ARE THE TYPE OF PERSON THAT GIVES THESE MONSTERS POWER TO TAKE WAY OUR RIGHTS!

2007-03-02 19:32:27 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

He or anyone else should be brought to court for anti Islamic or any other racist or anti religious statements as should you for trying to incite hatred against other religions.

2007-03-02 18:32:43 · answer #10 · answered by frankturk50 6 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers