It would certainly save her from doing all the travel that she has to do now in order to add to her collection.
2007-03-02 16:58:36 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
Well, in response to some of the answers, I wish she would do some of what Oprah Winfrey does with her money. Instead of trying to collect an assortment of children (which she will probably abandon to the paid help for care when the cameras are off), she could take the same money she is using now to "make her look good" and form foundations to care for children for generations to come. Oprah has set up just such foundations and doesn't have a slew of publicity hounds following her around and reporting on it. She's done more good with her money in 2 weeks than Jolie and Pitt have done in their entire lives. And her foundations will live on after her death for generations to come! What a REAL big hearted person.
2007-03-03 01:38:45 · update #1
aahhhhhhhhh haahahahahahaha
it's funny cuz it's true
2007-03-02 17:01:48 · answer #1 · answered by emm 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
There are a lot of things I don't like about her, but I admire the fact that Angelina Jolie is such an advocate for adoption, and that she is one to practice what she preaches. Instead of just attending fundraisers, she is out there actually doing something about the problem. In addition to taking individual children out of bad situations, I believe she also donates money to charities in the countries in which her children were born. It's a good thing. Don't knock her for that.
2007-03-02 17:04:50 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
She and the Bradster probably haven't thought of that yet. I suppose with all the traveling they do they probably don't have time to think. I am glad that she does some good with her money and celebrity status, but I don't think she should be rewarded any more than any other person for adopting any child from any place. I think that the news media make way too much of Angelina and Madonna because of their celebrity status. What about all of the millions of other normal people who adopt and are never recognized? Now that is really sad isn't it!!
2007-03-02 17:04:19 · answer #3 · answered by Cindy Roo 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Well she and Brad Pitt have plenty of money. So if they actually want to do something for needy children and give them love and care there is nothing wrong with it. We can only hope all this is not just a publicity stunt and, being an optimist, I personally believe it is not.
2007-03-02 20:11:18 · answer #4 · answered by arb_princess 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm sure her heart is in the right place, but she seems to be collecting children like most people collect stuffed animals or shoes. If she keeps it up, she will have a child from every nation in Africa, Asia and Europe. More power to her.
2007-03-02 17:14:03 · answer #5 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
..."her collection," lol
But hey, what she's doing is pretty cool; those kids will have an infinitely better life now thanks to her. Its nice that someone in Hollywood is doing something positive...
Cindy, wouldn't you rather see Angelina on the cover of a magazine saving those kids than Britney shaving her head or Paris showing off in some trampy way...?
2007-03-02 17:04:38 · answer #6 · answered by F 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
to answer ur first ?. probably not.she wants to be a parent and not an orphanage... but she is the most advocate person i can ever think of...and ur kids.....how do u think they will think of her? a great person who tried to do right..she is the only celebrity that i can say "ACTUALLY" does something with her money..! so think 'bout that.!.....L
2007-03-02 17:23:14 · answer #7 · answered by why h 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
YEAH, SHE SHOULD DO THAT. I GUESS SHE WANTS TO HAVE TEN KIDS TO TAKE CARE OF.
http://sponkit.wordpress.com
2007-03-02 17:04:58 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
she should just adopt Africa
2007-03-02 17:05:59 · answer #9 · answered by lones1983 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋