http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/070302/xm_radio_sirius_ashcroft.html?.v=1 I got Sirius at $4.33 and he needs to keep his mouth shut, also alan greenspan while I'm venting, how dare he burst everyones bubble with the awful truth, when people retire they're supposed to go away!
2007-03-02 14:18:40 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
if they would merge, I think they would have a monopoly
2007-03-02 14:22:32 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The main reason I picked Sirius over XM was because Sirius was the broadcaster for NFL games, and at the time the pre-season was just beginning.
If they could merge, I would not only have the football games, but I would get the baseball games XM currently broadcasts. So I think that would be the best of both worlds.
2007-03-02 15:33:13 · answer #2 · answered by some_guy_times_50 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am a little worried... I am an XM subscriber. I recently received an email from XM before the merger was formally announced. The merger is happening because of competition with Ipods and HD radio. There isn't enough market demand out there for all of these choices...especially in a less than stellar economy.
2007-03-02 14:23:25 · answer #3 · answered by Lilyisbeautiful 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think it will go through. There are too many roadblocks. Frankly, buying stock in either one is a mistake. If you own any I would dump it. The FCC point is a big one and they will have an uphill battle. Even if the merger does eventually happen your money would still do better in a ton of other stocks. Don't get over attached to any stock it is a sure fire way to loose money.
2007-03-02 14:37:36 · answer #4 · answered by C B 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think it's great. I listen to Howard Stern and when he was off I would listen to C-span radio which is no longer on Sirius. I was contemplating switching to XM because while I like Howard I love C-span radio which is only on XM. To have both again would be great.
2007-03-02 14:27:06 · answer #5 · answered by apple juice 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. they do no longer experience the experience like we human beings do. it truly is because we've a efficient anxious equipment operating through our vertebra (backbone) which sends messages to our mind. which means if if our leg is damage, we experience the soreness on the genuine mind. on the different hand, the insects are non-vertebra and they do no longer have efficient anxious equipment. subsequently if an ant's leg is beaten, in reality the leg will experience interior sight soreness. with the exception of, their soreness importance is short, because they produce large variety of off springs and their existence is short. they could also reproduce their lost organs. it truly is been said that in case you shrink a cockroach's head, it is going to die after a month using ravenous. Scientists have shrink a lobster's leg and feed him, which he ate. it truly is likewise genuine that except for human beings no different animal knows its existence.
2016-12-05 04:19:56 · answer #6 · answered by santella 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
didn't know about john ashcroft but am kinda pissed cuz i spent almost $6 per share on my sirius stock and it's in the toilet...they're payin howard stern entirely 2 much...
2007-03-02 14:27:29 · answer #7 · answered by Aurora Blue 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
"John Ashcroft gets paid" now? Dream on!
How about "Supreme Court Judges Roberts and Alito", do they get paid?
2007-03-02 15:04:32 · answer #8 · answered by Chatty82 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
monopolies are a sick thing. bill clinton let monopolies on the news media happen, and look at what we have now...government controlled news.
2007-03-02 14:27:11 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋