2007-03-02 14:02:35 · 13 answers · asked by Jerse 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
That's the point of the primary process. Candidates can test the water for future political ambitions they may have, & gain a bit of exposure. They can get some media attention for whatever their own causes & agenda might be, & the party gets to see who sells best w the country.
Then the bartering & dealmaking begins as candidates drop out & endorse whoever gave them the best offer for future power & prestige. The party will try to find the strongest candidate for President & then select a VP based upon strength in large populous states the Presidential candidate may be weak in, & to give the VP candidate some grooming for future races.
2007-03-02 14:11:16 · answer #1 · answered by SantaBud 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Along with Hillary you can have Rosie O'Donnell as Vice President and Jane Fonda as Secretary of Defense. This would be the ideal Hillary package
2007-03-03 11:57:25 · answer #2 · answered by kato outdoors 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sure they could. A lot can happen in the next 18 months.
Do yourself a favor and ignore all the candidates until next year.
2007-03-02 22:07:35 · answer #3 · answered by chimpus_incompetus 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It was preordained in June of 2006. Fat Ted Kennedy put it together. Hillery/ Obama !!!!!
2007-03-02 22:13:40 · answer #4 · answered by Boston Mark 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
What, you mean like those photo booths where you merge two people's photos together?
Who would pick gender?
2007-03-03 00:30:40 · answer #5 · answered by DAR 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
as what
Clintama
Obaton
Cobama
I would not suggest scientific experiments on them I think they are running for mayor or was it dog catcher. I know I saw them on T.V. running for something.
2007-03-02 22:10:49 · answer #6 · answered by Mother 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Like what? Morph?
2007-03-02 22:15:31 · answer #7 · answered by bugeyes 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
That would be a sure fire way to guarantee a lose!! I hope they combine!!
2007-03-02 22:07:46 · answer #8 · answered by J S 4 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Two over inflated egos, no I don't think so.
2007-03-02 22:17:16 · answer #9 · answered by rosi l 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Those would be some ugly kids - sorry, couldn't resist.
2007-03-02 22:05:57 · answer #10 · answered by ArgleBargleWoogleBoo 3 · 4⤊ 1⤋