currently im not 100% certain that there was a conspiracy. but it seems much more plausible then the hijacking story.
but this video explains how tower 7 fell down,
and why the media wont show this to you.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=okLrWV6ObwI
it also explains how the owner of the building lied about the towers being pulled!!!
2007-03-02
13:54:30
·
18 answers
·
asked by
Honor
2
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
its not just youtube.
many scholars and scientists agree:
http://911scholars.org/\
2007-03-02
13:59:25 ·
update #1
ive seen www.911myths.com.
that didnt explain anything about tower 7
2007-03-02
14:04:19 ·
update #2
False
2007-03-02 13:57:55
·
answer #1
·
answered by Gemini Girl 4
·
4⤊
3⤋
Sheeple People who refuse to accept the fact that the U.S. Government had their hand in the Terror Attacks of 911 are just plain ignorant. It's impossible for Jet fuel or Kerosene to melt iron...LOOK AT THE PERIODIC TABLE OF ELEMENTS. Also if the floors collapsed causing a chain reaction it would have taken well over 90 seconds for the buildings to come down. They came down at free fall speed....9 seconds. There is no logical argument here. Explosives were pre-planted in the building. Case closed! Some idiots will argue that the fires were raging hot inferno’s...however if that was the case then why were there people standing in the holes where the planes impacted waving for help? Their clothes weren’t even burnt. Here we are talking about the biggest crime scene in the history of the United States...and what did Guilani do?
He scooped up all the evidence and got rid of it as fast as he possibly could. Sent overseas to be recycled? I doubt it...my guess is they dumped it all in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean.
If any of you nincompoops would look at the evidence...it's a common tactic for a country to injure or attack itself and then blame it on the enemy. Then we can go get em. Common tactic, there is even a name for it...it’s called.. “Pretext for Military Intervention” Why don't all you wonderful wise little kids tell me why NORAD didn't scramble any fighters to escort the hijacked planes down? They didn't miss 1, but 3!! Anytime a commercial airline goes off course without explanation, within 10 minutes, fighter jets are supposed to escort them down. Especially the air space over the Pentagon! Hmmm. How convenient. You think it was because Bush ordered Cheney to take control over NORAD the same morning of the attacks? Did you also know that the WTC changed owners about six months prior to the attacks? Did you also know that the buildings were worth more if destroyed than standing? That Larry Silverstein is the man who cashed out on the scam...walking away with billions? Did you know that there was a flurry of activity on Wall Street prior to the attacks, and the majority of the trading was “Put options” on the doomed Airlines stock? Did you know that there were multiple explosions heard inside the buildings from all kinds of firefighters, police officers and witnesses? Did you know that WTC Building 7 fell at approximately 5:30 p.m.? That the building did not suffer any major damage, but it somehow blew up into a fine pile of dust? Do you Morons even know what propaganda is? Do you know that it is also a well known and effectively used tool for the government to pull the wool over your eyes? Well, don't say we didn't warn you when your asking yourself 5 years from now "How could this happen?" It's sheeple people who make it easy for the government to do whatever they want. Educate yourself and open your eyes folks. This is real, and there are more than just a couple of us who think so. Go to google and type in Terror Attacks of 911...have yourself a look at all the choices there are to choose from.
2007-03-03 10:42:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
www.911myths.com
read that and then we can discuss it.
""ive seen www.911myths.com.
that didnt explain anything about tower 7""
that page explains pretty much every facet of every conspiracy from every angle of 911. so you didnt read it.
-- oh and btw yoru 911scholars list includes not a single demolitions expert, not a single mettalurgist, and only one person who claims to be a structural engineer but is in fact working in structural engineering but not a degree in the field.
2007-03-02 13:59:30
·
answer #3
·
answered by sociald 7
·
4⤊
2⤋
I talked to a fireman, who was in Manhattan that day, he is retired now, he told me that there where oil talks stored under building 7 and they exploded, so I don't know what's true or false anymore.
but a political discussion about this with some of those people who say it was a conspiracy would make sense to me, of cause on national TV, that would give them great rating I bet
2007-03-02 14:20:47
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
Yea the conspiricy of 18 middle eastern men taking over 4 planes and hitting 75%of their targets , at the same time making NORAD stand down and demolishing a building it didnt even hit , seems a little far fetched .
2007-03-02 14:01:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by prole1984 5
·
4⤊
2⤋
I am not sure who was behind the 9/11 attacks, but I sure think alot of questions still need to be answered.
2007-03-02 14:00:04
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
this guy is so well known I've never heard of him.
There is no point in debating this, it's not a conspiracy. If so it's just so well orchestrated and coincidental that Osama Bin Laden just happened to want to take credit... stupid.
2007-03-02 14:00:36
·
answer #7
·
answered by Modus Operandi 6
·
5⤊
1⤋
Sigh. They can explain their theories all day and night. These people are nothing but mouthpieces for OBL. And I don't care if they are scholars,priests,military or Trekkies.
2007-03-02 14:08:39
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
1⤋
False. The conspiracy theory is ridiculous.
2007-03-02 13:59:55
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
7⤊
3⤋
False. And you really should try better sources than youtube if you want to be taken seriously.
2007-03-02 14:28:22
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋