English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

It will only work once, Which one to save. John Lennon, or Jim Morrison. Would the Doors have evolved? Done greater things? Would John got back with the Beatles? What to do? What to do?

2007-03-02 13:37:00 · 21 answers · asked by mitchell2020 5 in Entertainment & Music Music

21 answers

John had already done so much.
I would save Jim Morrison. Who knows where his music would have gone if he hadn't been so heavy into the drugs. He was a real poet. He had some unique thoughts. They say a lot of times he would say things in concert just to watch how the crowd would react. He loved to study human nature.

2007-03-02 14:09:43 · answer #1 · answered by Lynn T 3 · 0 0

Jim Morrison

2007-03-02 21:40:30 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

John Lennon. To bring Jim Morrison back is no guarantee that he would not OD again...which he probably would...he never overcame or even faced his demons that eventually took his life at such a young age. John Lennon was an amazing talent and very prophetic composer & poet. Genius. God only knows what else he would have given us had his life not been stolen from him. Jim died by choice, John did not.

2007-03-02 21:49:06 · answer #3 · answered by auntcookie84 6 · 2 0

i would definitely chose jim morrison! john lennon was also a great person and all but jim morrison is more my guy you know? i'm a huge fan of the doors and own all their albums and know practically all the songs by heart! cuz i love jim morrison's voice and the doors are nothing without him. for me, THE guy from the beatles isn't john lennon but paul mccartney.

2007-03-03 04:18:17 · answer #4 · answered by Lux 4 · 0 0

Ooh, tough question..

For me, it would be Morrison... mostly just 'cause I love the Doors.
Though... John Lennon (when he was with the Beatles or solo) was an amazing artist.


And the people that said Kurt Cobain.. he's a good one to save too! lol. Other people I'd save.. Jimi Hendrix.. Janis Joplin.. Buddy Holly

2007-03-02 21:43:48 · answer #5 · answered by ♥ Dani 6 · 0 0

Hmm, very difficult as both are huge influences of mine, Jom was still young and everything but The Doors was basically over and Jim was ready to die, John on the other hand had more music planned and had two little boys he could've been there for (especially Sean as he was only five) so I think I would save John, even though saving Jim would've been easier (I think Jim would easily believe someone from the future coming to save him as with John you would ave to make up some lie and then ofcourse with Jim you just take the liquor and the pills away or wake Pam up sooner, and with John you would have to kill the assailant.)

FInal answer: John, for the sake of Julian and Sean.

2007-03-02 21:45:00 · answer #6 · answered by sarah h 2 · 4 0

Jim Morrison. I don't know if the Doors would have done greater things, but Morrison would have. He was a freaking genius - in all senses of the word.

2007-03-02 21:40:31 · answer #7 · answered by They call me ... Trixie. 7 · 0 0

John Lennon. I would not even think twice.

2007-03-02 21:48:07 · answer #8 · answered by Catarina 2 · 3 0

john lennon

2007-03-02 21:40:44 · answer #9 · answered by Kate 2 · 0 0

i would have to save john/for both are GREAT but johns life was taking from him and jims life style{by choice}took his but it would be great to have them both back,,,,they where both so deep,and yes they both used drugs jim just let the drugs controll him,and who know if john wouldn't have been killed he may have let the drugs controll him to the same extent jim did,we are just blessed they left us what they did so we and others can enjoy forever just my thoughts

2007-03-02 21:54:42 · answer #10 · answered by southern65 3 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers