2007-03-02 12:50:16 · 9 answers · asked by dan v 2 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Zoology
It's been proven to be a myth.
2007-03-02 12:53:24 · answer #1 · answered by Neilos 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
This has been tested twice, though the answers contradict one another. Mythbusters tested this theory and the duck's quack did not echo, the Braniac tested the same theory and their findings showed that a duck's quack did echo.
2007-03-02 23:30:46 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. The duck's echo is just quite not very audible.
2007-03-02 21:00:10 · answer #3 · answered by Spaceman Spiff 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why not reveal where you read that?
An echo is dependent on sound bouncing off surfaces. Any sound.
2007-03-02 21:06:33 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
QUACK! Quack, Quack, Quack, quack, quack
2007-03-02 20:52:35 · answer #5 · answered by Amish Rebel 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Myth busted.
2007-03-02 20:52:58 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Don't believe everything you see on the Aflack commercials!
2007-03-02 20:53:37 · answer #7 · answered by 1truthseeker 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
disproven
check out these links
http://www.acoustics.salford.ac.uk/acoustics_world/duck/duck.htm
http://buzz.smm.org/buzz/blog/does_a_ducks_quack_echo
2007-03-02 20:55:21 · answer #8 · answered by ♪ ♫ ☮ NYbron ☮ ♪ ♫ 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
did you read that somewhere besides in your question?
2007-03-02 20:52:54 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋