Ok, I had no interest in this woman's life until recent bizarre events.
My question is, how could an appellate judge have legally ruled in her favor when Marshall's will did not include her? The man must have known her greedy intentions but knew he had little time left, so he would have amended his will if he wanted to include her, right? She probably had a trust fund anyway that would have taken care of her for the rest of her life.
Also, how would Dannielynn have a stake in his money when her mother is dead? Wouldn't the lawsuit end at her death since she never had a child by Marshall? I know she's represented by an "estate" but come on!
2007-03-02
12:43:54
·
4 answers
·
asked by
Nels
7
in
Politics & Government
➔ Law & Ethics