I've noticed in all the questions about George W. Bush all the answers and even the question are eather against or for George Bush. So, I am asking people to give ONE pro AND ONE con (biggest pro and biggest con in your opinion). And then say wich one is better (if the pro is worth the con... or if the con is to great to be cancelled out by the pro).
2007-03-02 12:43:01 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Pro- going after terrorists
Con- the illegal alien problem
The pro outweighs the con because terrorists are pursuing weapons of mass destruction, and we need to eradicate.
2007-03-02 12:53:21 · answer #1 · answered by bigsey93bruschi54 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Pro: Takes real action
Con: Doesn't do a great job at rationalizing his movements to the public. They're too stupid to figure it out for themselves, get scared and confused, and start jumping on the bandwagon to abuse him, without considering other minor factors such as confidential military intelligence, homeland intelligence, logic, humanitarian efforts, and the other 530-odd members of Congress that all play a part in making decisions concerning the country. Because, you know, one single man makes every single decision by himself apparently, according to the biased unlearned jackasses who know nothing about their own country's legal system, who like to hang around communities such as this.
Obviously, the Pro here outweighs the Con.
2007-03-02 21:21:37 · answer #2 · answered by oracle128au 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Pro-Continues to fight the war on terror
Con-Helped make the United States the most hated country on the planet
2007-03-02 21:36:33 · answer #3 · answered by Gemini Girl 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
pros - he is trying to help the people in iraq so he started a war
cons - when hes trying to help the people of iraq hes kinda killing everyone and getting all the army men shot and causing much havoc. his main reason for starting the war probably wasnt even trying to help the people of iraq but to take there oil.
the con is so much a bigger thing then the pro that they dont even compare so overall george w bush is a bad president
2007-03-03 18:12:02 · answer #4 · answered by xbkimx 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Pro:
umm, I don't know
Con:
-Greatest deficit ever
-Constantly lies
-Rated worst President by historians
-Illegal Alien worker program will hurt economy
-Nullified the "Bill of Rights" with the 'Patriot Act'
-War in Iraq with no relation to 9/11
-Made Iraq into a recruiting tool for the Taliban which made them bigger and stronger.
-Didn't arrest Osama when he had the chance
-Violated Constitution
-Violated Laws put forth by the Geneva convention
-Refused to listen to 4-star General's warnings
I know more but these are just off the top of my head. Here are some links for you to look at.
2007-03-02 22:26:53 · answer #5 · answered by jpferrierjr 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Pro: He wasn't in power during the Cold War (can you IMAGINE???)
Con: He refuses to listen to any point of view other than his own.
2008 can't come fast enough!!
2007-03-02 21:06:30 · answer #6 · answered by inuvikrx 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I can't think of anything pro Bush, but he should be a CONvict.
2007-03-02 20:56:09 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Pro - presidency nearing end
Con - the last six years of his presidency
2007-03-02 20:59:07 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
there are no pros to that man, the con hes a bigoted racist son of a *****. end of story.
2007-03-02 20:52:41 · answer #9 · answered by ranaway628 3 · 2⤊ 3⤋