Why do we still have U.S. military in Kosovo?

Question

Is it because slick willie sent them there and it is OK for U.S. servicemen and women to fight and die there. And when are they coming home? and why hasnt the U.S. media reported on this subject? I Guess this war was O.K!!! Its only been 10 or so years. Or was it because Christians were doing the killing and muslims were doing the dieing this time. Some one please explain the BIAS Between the two

Answer 1

for the same reason we have them in korea,japan,germany and other countries after the fact. we are still needed. troops were sent into a NATO operation as a member we have an obligation,in exchange we have our nukes stored in various NATO members countries. which is actually a violation of the NPT.

Answer 2

The media doesn't want our attention drawn away from Iraq and President Bush. There isn't a bias, but the media won't put the democrats in a negative light right now so close to 2008.

Answer 3

No. which might you decide on. One superpower status for peace and freedom by way of out the worldwide or a hundred man or woman and efficient armies able to incalculable destruction? Japan is a small u . s . a ., yet previous to worldwide conflict II, they have been able to construct up sufficient militia could to overcome China, South East Asia or perhaps to declare conflict on the U. S.. Germany replaced into little larger than Georgia and yet they have been able to do plenty the comparable subject. could you decide on we go away international locations to construct up a sufficient militia could to repeat this journey or could you decide on that the U.S. stay the worldwide police stress? i could desire the U.S. we've in simple terms have been given to paintings out the thank you to apply it and pay for it. yet I assure you that the U.S. as a worldwide police stress is plenty extra inexpensive in money and lives than a 0.33 worldwide conflict.

Answer 4

Here's an interesting report compiled by the Department of Defense's Manpower Data Center.

This includes all active duty deaths all over the world.

Active duty deaths during Clinton's first four years (1993 - 1996): 4302

Active duty deaths during Bush's first four years (2001 - 2004): 5187

The difference? 885 deaths over four years, or about 221 deaths a year. Of course, during Bush's first four years in office we liberated both Afghanistan and Iraq. What did we accomplish, in terms of military victories, during Clinton's first four years in office?

Answer 5

Here's something they don't mention a lot.

In May, the NATO bombing campaign resulted in a major international incident when the Chinese embassy in Belgrade was bombed, resulting in the deaths of several Chinese journalists. The bombing of the embassy outraged the Chinese public - who have never accepted the bombing was an accident - and was a major sticking point in U.S.-China relations in the years following.

http://worldnews.about.com/b/a/251258.htm

Answer 6

What do they call a 1/4 punder with cheese in Kosovo?

Answer 7

We should have let the Christian Serbs take care of the Muslims when they had the chance.But of course,Osama Clinton intervened to save their sorry asses

Answer 8

How many servicemen and women were killed during that war during the Clinton years? How many have been killed since?

Answer 9

Because France and Germany won't go

Answer 10

Ithe bias is in your head....