Or will his refusal to step down force the hands of others to remove him?
2007-03-02 12:13:03 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
January 2008 and not a minute sooner.
2007-03-02 12:16:59 · answer #1 · answered by moezambik 2 · 5⤊ 1⤋
History has a way of repeating itself as the observation goes. Sooner, or, later, as the tide continues to turn, the people will respond to the pervasive sickness that permeates this regime and the land, and do something about it. The populace will once again become sick and tired of the sickness. When that happens, and I do believe that day is coming, a second president in my lifetime will be leaving the White House in disgrace. The people will line the streets and salute farewell to the commander-in-thief in similar fashion to how they "welcomed" him on "inauguration" day, June 20, 2001. The difference this time will be, however, that George W. Bush will be leaving the White without legitimately having been elected in the first place.
2007-03-02 20:17:13 · answer #2 · answered by dstr 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I really wish you people would stop this kind of talk. To all Americans, I implore you. If you feel you have a valid point please site it for us. So far all I hear is that Bush lied about WMD even though that has been disproven over and over. His performance has be sketchy in some respects and excellent in others. Treason? What in the world are you going on about?
Bill Clinton allowed Loral Corp. (a big contributor to his campaign) to sell sensitive missile technology to the Chinese even though his own State Department begged him not to.
Al Gore accepted campaign contributions from foreign sources. (remember "no controlling legal authority?)
Democrat Patrick Lehey was kicked off the intelligence committee for leaking secrets.
Sandy Burger stole original extremely secret documents by stuffing them in his pants.
Do you find these actions to be treasonous or are they acceptable to you?
2007-03-02 20:49:59 · answer #3 · answered by Jacob W 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Congressional hippies can't remove Bush if they tried. To find a president guilty, two thirds of the senate needs to agree. Only half of the senate is Democrat. :)
THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION
Clause 6: The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present.
2007-03-02 20:16:45 · answer #4 · answered by a bush family member 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
He won't, he is not incompetent, there is no dereliction of duty and there is no treason. Do us a favor please and label this kind of question FOR LIBERALS ONLY. It will not only save time, but you'll actually get answers you like. Wouldn't that be nice?
2007-03-02 23:26:29 · answer #5 · answered by rosi l 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nothing will happen, he'll just do his term, and be remebered as the low point of American history and the national emarrassment, and spend his years is his stupid drunken stupor. Alcohol has killed his brain, while he probably never had any human emotions or traits like remorse or conscience - as we have heard from his speeches and seen from his actions (Mission Accomplished comes to mind), his brain is severely underdeveloped.
2007-03-02 20:17:14 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think that the Democrats and Liberals should also look at themselves and blame themselves for the crimes that they are committing by use of violence and civil unrest when they do not get their way.
Speaking of treason, liberals support that military officer that is abandoning his post in favor of "peace", when in fact he is just plain scared and brainwashed into cowardice by liberals that say that the war is wrong.
Freedom of speech is our right, but when liberals who don't even have courage to fight in keeping the USA safe, support death row inmates and encourage freeing them so that they can commit those heinous crimes again, badmouth the government that is providing them jobs and a safe country to live in, advocate violence just to prove the Republicans and conservatives wrong during their demonstrations.
If name calling and empty threats are all they can do, the liberals should just quit starting trouble and just live life the way it should be lived..... Carefree and without worrying about politics. Leave the troubleshooting to Congress, who should be supporting you anyway, since they are mostly Democrats. Can't we all get along?????
2007-03-02 20:24:22 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
If Bush were ever guilty of such things, I think he would be honorable enough to step down, afterall, he's not a modern Democrat. Do you really think they can trump up enough charges to force an impeachment when almost half the Senate is Republican?
2007-03-02 20:22:50 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
You might not want to say things like that or you might just find the secret service at your door.
I think not completely and utterly destroying our enemy is his biggest error.
2007-03-02 20:32:55 · answer #9 · answered by hopeful 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
When will Congress start doing there job
2007-03-06 20:07:09 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋