cops spun this maniac out of controll to stop him, subsequntially crippling him for life...but...
If the cops had'nt stoped him, and he killed someone at the next intersection, then the Liberal media would be attacking the officer for not doing his job.
2007-03-02 11:45:05 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
it's easy to say the cops overreacted AFTER the fact. If the lights come on you did something wrong pull over and take your friggin $75 ticket for being a jerk. if you run well so far im for the guy who says cops should be allowed to shoot you in the head
2007-03-02 14:47:17 · update #1
He is allowed a lawyer by law.
He shouldn't win a liability suit. Any injury you get while running from the cops is your own damn fault.
If you run.. the cops should be allowed to shoot you in the head to stop you.
2007-03-02 11:50:41 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
The police are allowed to stop fleeing vehicles reckoning on the reason and the circumstances. If a criminal is in touch then the police can use somewhat some skill to stop the vehicle. even nevertheless it certainly relies upon on the departments pursuit coverage. that's what should be regarded at. If the officer accompanied coverage, then there is little you're able to do. He replaced into following the regulation and branch regulations. If no longer then you fairly could desire to have a case.
2016-09-30 03:13:54 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
of course he gets a lawyer , this is America . what was original offense that he ran from ? if the cops thought he robbed a bank or killed someone , i think the cops were right . but if he ran a stop sign or some minor stuff , then they overreacted .
2007-03-02 12:00:32 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
well he should be allowed a lawyer, but at the same time i doubt it will help much, and btw what ifs dont really hold up in a court of law, not that it matters, cuz sounds like the cops were just doing their job
2007-03-02 11:50:06 · answer #4 · answered by bigjacka55 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The law requires that if he cannot afford a lawyer, a lawyer will be appointed by the court. LAW OF THE LAND.
Read the U.S. Constitution.
2007-03-02 12:04:53 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
He deserves a lawyer as I'm sure he's being charged with all KINDS of felonies...even if he IS paralyzed. That's the way our system works. What I hope he doesn't get is an ambulance chaser.
2007-03-02 11:49:08 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Miranda Rights intitle everyone a lawyer
2007-03-02 11:48:58 · answer #7 · answered by TEFMLB 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
In the USA everybody is entitled to a lawyer....read the Constitution.
2007-03-02 11:59:40 · answer #8 · answered by daljack -a girl 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither he nor a lawyer would be looking to sue if they didn't think they could win > And that is the REAL problem
2007-03-02 11:50:05 · answer #9 · answered by pavano_carl 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it's in the Bill of Rights that everonoe is allowed al lawyer no matter what you did wrong even if you can not afford one
2007-03-02 12:23:57 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋