Jamal Lewis is not coming to the Browns after he totally pwned them in his 2,000 yard season. They should draft Adrian PETERSON.
2007-03-02 11:45:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by Will the Thrill 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why would the Browns want a head case like Lewis when they can get a guy like Peterson in the draft that can make them better immediately? The Browns will go after the best player available when they choose at pick # 3. That player is undoubtably Peterson. Also, instead of trying to fill the too many holes that they have (i.e; OL, DL, etc.), they will concentrate on getting the one solid guy in the one position that will help the team the most. Why go with retreads when you can get a brand new one that will work out better???
2007-03-05 14:49:05
·
answer #2
·
answered by P.I. Stingray 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
No doubt, Adrian Peterson, Kids amazing, Jamal Lewis is a joke and wont help the browns, they need a quick, elusive and powerful runner like Adrian Peterson. He will be a Great running back in the NFL and will help the browns, they should draft him.
2007-03-02 12:01:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by Matt 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
If I were the Browns, sure i would draft AD. I mean, look what happened to the Texans when they DIDNT draft Reggie Bush last year. (Not that he would have solved all their problems but with Dominick Davis going down it really highlightened it)
I mean, what do the Browns have to lose? They have been bitten by the John Elway come back twice, and no matter what they just have never been able to break through to the Super Bowl in all their years of existents (yes i know the pre-super bowl championships they had, but still)
I havent seen Frye play that much, but he cant be that bad if he was drafted as their future at QB. If your young QB struggles, you dont bentch him for another youth: you get bettter players for him to throw to and hand off to. AD sure fits that bill.
And if the Browns are really down on Frye then drafting AD in the first round, then taking that local kid out of Ohio State named Smith in the 3rd or 4th round.
2007-03-02 13:29:01
·
answer #4
·
answered by Count DiMera 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
If Peterson is there, they have to draft him. They have tried other running backs since getting the team back, but none have panned out, Droughns has been the best so far. Some rookies have done well initially with poor lines. Marshall Faulk and Billy Sims made immediate impact to their teams as rookies.
2007-03-04 08:38:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by steve p 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
They should think about offenseive line restructure FIRST before ever thinking of drafting Peterson. You can have the greatest running back in the world, but without an offensive line you still have NOTHING! Thats where it all starts! Go Browns!
2007-03-02 18:38:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by F. C 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
i think they want Peterson but if Joe Thomas is on the board when they're on the clock I gotta believe they take him
2007-03-02 12:10:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by mdiggity 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
they should invest in the future and get peterson, the kid is gonna be good.
2007-03-03 10:40:08
·
answer #8
·
answered by guero 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Any- body they can get that's good.
2007-03-02 11:44:52
·
answer #9
·
answered by Sugar 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
I don't know - they need so much.
2007-03-02 11:46:07
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋