and if you could explain why i'd appreciate it Thanks!!!!!!
2007-03-02 10:30:46 · 25 answers · asked by Lil'D 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I personally favor Pelosi in case u wanna know and I hope she will take the initiative to push foward the passing of embryonic stem cell research. Especially since there are enough Democrats in both The House and Senate to oveturn Bush's damn veto!
2007-03-03 12:35:46 · update #1
Favorable, she has addressed more issues & has done
more than Bush & co. in 6 years.
It seems like while the right spends their time trying to find
things to pick her apart with, she is spending her time on
trying to do what is best for the country.
2007-03-02 11:00:41 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
She is extremely bright and capable. And, astrologically, an Aries Dragon--not an "average" human. Alas, however, all of the top Washington insiders, of both parties are owned by the same "interests". The democrats are just a bit more nuanced about it.
So, don't be too surprised, when the chimperator in chief still winds up getting what his owners want. The agendas are written in stone at this time. But, will they really get away with it? One item that seems, according to observers of the scene, to be a possible agenda item, is another "false flag" terrorist operation insuring the "need" for a declaration of martial law to maintain the nazis in power, in the upcoming year or so.
We definitely live in "interesting times", i fear. :)))
2007-03-02 18:41:52 · answer #2 · answered by drakke1 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Hypocritical...She is another of those extreme liberals who want to legislate how everyone else can save the planet but flies her family and friends back and forth to California in a Jumbo Jet. I am pretty sick and tired of politicians telling me I have to do this or I have to do that while they get a free ride on my dime. Nancy Pelosi's latest Idea is to make all the federal buildings in Washington environmentally friendly or 'green'. Now that might be a good idea but before you start spending my tax dollars...park the jet.
2007-03-02 18:48:12 · answer #3 · answered by jeff_loves_life 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
She is doing okay. She has great opposition still lurking in the House and in the Whitehouse. She does not have unlimited powers. Compared to her 3 predecessors I would give her high marks so far. Things can change, however. She is leading a House that is doing something. The previous one or so did zip.
2007-03-02 18:41:15 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
She is evidently a respected member of the Democratic party and has the confidence of her constituents. She, as Speaker of the House, is mainly just trying to run things in an orderly fashion.
Overall I would have to say favorable.
2007-03-02 18:37:23 · answer #5 · answered by don n 6 · 4⤊ 2⤋
She is a Tiger!! And I think she is going to be a great speaker.
She doesn't pander to special interest, shoots straight from the hip (like Senator Clinton) and takes no prisoners. She tells it like it is.
How refreshing.
2007-03-02 19:46:35 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Positive, favorable 8 points from 10
2007-03-02 18:33:28 · answer #7 · answered by Aladino Z 2 · 4⤊ 5⤋
Undecided, she has only been speaker of the house for one and a half months. There really hasn't been enough time fore me to form a legitimate opinion of her.
2007-03-02 18:33:58 · answer #8 · answered by msi_cord 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Favorable. I am still enchanted by the faux unity shown during the State of the union address.
2007-03-02 18:34:41 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
Nothing good ever came out of San Francisco.
2007-03-02 18:47:17 · answer #10 · answered by SGT 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋