Is Circumcision really a cosmetic thing?

Question

I am an uncircumcised male over 40. Before I was married (teens - early twenties) I was surprised that women I dated never commented on my being intact- natural until the relationship developed and I brought it up. Most of them had never been with an intact male and they did not realize it. That is they did not perceive that I had a foreskin. They saw my penis erect, felt it in a condom and I was very meticulous about being clean before a date. Usually, showering together (where my penis would get erect again) and walking around naked did not happen until the relationship developed. From these experiences I do not get the talk of woman thinking natural penises are ugly (icky?). I don't understand the amputation culture in view of:

One can feel the part so after amputation you must be missing something.
The head of the penis when exposed gets chaffed, it must be better to be protected -- there are medical benefits to not cutting that are not mentioned to parents. Doesn't circ cause ED?
Sex can be different in the natural form (that is what partners have said).

Is the snickering of woman about natural guys a real thing or contrived from inexperience and prejudice?

Answer 1

Some very immature girls think a natural penis looks ugly, but these same girls think ALL penises look ugly anyway. The hygiene excuse for circumcision is a crock. It takes about 5 seconds a day to clean an uncut penis. Circumcision is an anti-sex procedure which has been justified by various excuses over the years, but the real purpose is to cut down on sexual activity by making it less pleasurable. Girls with no experience tend to believe all these anti-foreskin myths, but once they've experienced sex with an intact man, all that changes.

Mature women prefer natural penises -- 90% of women who've been with both mutilated and uncut men said the sex was better with the men who still had all their man parts. http://www.healthcentral.com/drdean/408/60750.html

Answer 2

The theory that that's extra troublesome to bathe a uncircumcised penis and it could bypass infections extra somewhat is a delusion. fairly, the foreskin prevents an infection and retains the penis cleanser than a circumcised penis. As for what seems 'gross', i don't see how all of us can choose the look of a godawful scarred, mutilated, dried-out and sexually dysfuctional penis. An intact penis seems typical - a circumcised one sounds like a terrible accident. The AAP says that circumcision has purely 'ability' advantages - meaning that some human beings desperately want it to be useful, yet technology has yet to discover a single shown earnings of the technique. The AAP additionally notes that there are actual (not purely ability) drawbacks. a variety of drawbacks is that a circumcised guy can on no account returned have typical intercourse. Circumcision makes the want for Viagra 4.5 situations extra probably. It additionally makes a guy as much as 4 situations extra probably to be contaminated with HIV. in short, each and every thing you think of you comprehend approximately circumcision is faulty.

Answer 3

No, it is not!

It is a mutilation thing. Like sticking a bone through your nose, or a plate in your lips, or clitorectomys, or chiseling your teeth to points.. or any of those other weird things that primitive tribes do.

Answer 4

it is not cosmetic it changes the function of your penis.read these.

Answer 5

it makes you feel
good when youre
cicumcised
anyway,its not
for cosmetic doodles
its the way to remove the
white things inside
your prepuce
when not circumcised
this thing will become thicker and thicker
-thats only an opiion dude!-

Answer 6

No, it is a health thing.

The smegma that collects under the foreskin attracts bacteria and although you clean under there others may not and it can get infected.