Do Democrats have any clue about IRAQ?

Question

If you consider that there has been an average of 160,000

troops in the Iraq theater of operations during the last 32 months, and a

total of 2,912 deaths, that gives a firearm death rate of 55 per 100,000

soldiers.





The firearm death rate in Washington D.C. is 80.6 per

100,000 for the same period. That means that you are about 25% more

likely to be shot and killed in the

U.S. Capitol, which has the strictest gun

control laws in the nation, than you are in Iraq .





Conclusion: The U.S. should pull out of Washington D.C.


ahhh politics.. pull out of iraq that will lead to prolonged suffering and extreamist and ignore greater death in our streets.. gotta love Democrats and the socilist state.

Answer 1

Nope.


Noyce question.

Answer 2

Does this guy have any clue about history or current events?

Your argument is based off of the logic of the US death toll is not relatively high enough compared to your own imaginary scale.
That's the justification for this conflict according to your current arguement.

It is baseless and frivilous.


I do love (true) Democrats and "socialist" values.
And I for the sake of the planet, I fear (neo-con) repbulicans and their fascist values.


Obviously you don't realize that you are being fascist.
But neither did any of the popular majorities of a country during any time period we now look back on with amazement. That's how it works. I mean lets face it, neo-cons killed jesus, tortured christians in the coliseum, lead the inquisition, supported hitler, performed genocide on the native americans, sold information to the redcoats, dominated the slave trade, and consistently break their own records for deficity spending.

It's okay.
It's all part of nature and the human experience.
Thankfully over time the conservative majority is becomming more and more liberal - more and more progressive.
Its basically a social evolutionary process.
They have stopped lynching people, started giving women equal rights, many support the seperation of church and state.

It's a positive trend.

Answer 3

First of all, to my knowledge, most democratic candidates were in favor of the war and believe in finishing what "we've" started in Iraq rather than immediate troop withdrawal. So, the Democrat comments really make no sense in that regard. This is one of the reasons I'm having trouble finding someone to vote for. Most politicians are in favor of Bush's stay the course nonsense. And second, the fact that D.C. has a higher murder rate than soldiers in Iraq is not a logical argument for deployment to Iraq. In fact, just the opposite. Those soldiers wouldn't be killed at all if they weren't in Iraq, unless, of course, they were in one of the high crime cities like you mentioned. We are not served by our soldiers' presence in Iraq. The Iraqis and Isaraelis are. I'm all for redeployment of the troops to the border and any high crime city you'd like to list.
As to gun control. You're right. I've never understood the push for gun control. Bowling for Columbine proved that attitudes towards violence, problem solving and the use of guns is a much higher factor in gun crime than the number of people who own guns. So in America, gun control isn't the answer. Attitude and criminal control would be a better step to take.

Answer 4

Why do you think people are killed in DC? It's probably because of a drug deal gone bad, an argument or a lover quarrel. You are obviously safer in DC if you mind your own business and don't get into trouble. In Iraq, US soldiers become targets just for being US soldiers. I think people would be afraid to live in DC if, say, people wearing suits became targets and were killed just for wearing suits. You can put any kind of spin on statistics that you want to support your argument but it doesn't prove anything. It's called pandering and Democrats are as guilty of this as Republicans (just go see Al Gore's global warming movie if you don't believe me).

Answer 5

So conservative hate radio is giving percent of death. Well bucko 1% in Iraq is too many as it is in Washington. When funds are cut our cities can't afford police so what is DC to do? With Iraq the whole mess is voluntary. We got into the quagmire and we should expect casualties.

Why do you not think Democrats have a clue about Iraq? It seems to me they know more than you do because they don't have to listen to conservative hate radio for their information.

Answer 6

thats all beside the point. If your Neocon inspired republican party had had a clue we would not be trying to address your inane points above.

When will people like you finally admit that the policies of the current administration have failed on just about every front?

Does bush support our Troops while his friends rake in profits while at the same time he lets wounded troops languish and suffer in substandard conditions?

Come on get over it your President/leadership has failed this country admit it and lets move on.

Throw the bum/bush in jail...

Answer 7

Democrats and Republicans are the comparable. in the back of close doorways Dems and Reps are consistently in contract. To something of the worldwide, they act like they are against one yet another. This creates the phantasm there are 2 aspects of ever subject. actually, they are the comparable subject. The helpful government, run with the help of bureaucratic servants referred to as Democrats and Republicans, understand that there is a 11% approval cost of the government with the help of the U. S. voters. that's unacceptable to the Dems and Reps. they choose away to instruct there potential. So arising an apprehension ecosystem, gets the voters interest. this will additionally enable them to portray they are doing something for the voters that cannot be refrained from the government. I't is a forced acceptance of potential in all its tyranny. between the regulations of conflict while dealing with a greater enemy is to divide and conquer, quite then to attack your enemies stress as an entire. understanding that voters and there constitutional freedoms/rights are a thee governments suitable enemy, arising a diversionary tactic including Republican and Democrat could divide the governments enemies "voters + constitutional freedoms/rights" as quickly as divided, the enemy is plenty much less puzzling to overcome. hence, as quickly as we are divided, the helpful government can get rid of freedoms/rights, and enforce tyrannous regulations plenty much less puzzling than if we've been united. Vote for anybody else as properly Democrats or Republicans. I't may be anybody beginning from a 0.33 occasion candidate to Mickey Mouse. do exactly no longer vote for Democrats or Republicans. They have been offered and paid for a protracted time in the past with the help of bureaucrats. while Dems or Reps are elected, they serve the pastimes of transnational companies that paid for them to get elected, no longer the voters. I't is the suitable performing out of a "solid cop undesirable cop" situation in history. in simple terms undergo in strategies. The Tea occasion is the Republican occasion. "I'f your a multi-billion dollar transnational corporation and you pay for, a million President + 435 Congressmen + a hundred Senators + 9 superb court docket Justices, then you definately've finished potential over 350,000,000+ voters and all there supplies."

Answer 8

Not everyone in DC have access to weapons. Weak argument.

Answer 9

Yes they do

Answer 10

The question should be, do they have any clue period.

Answer 11

Yes you do.