Who here has become convinced that the 9/11 commision report is false?

Question

If you are convinced, state approx. when this happened for you.

Answer 1

Of course it's false! the bush admin didn't even want to have an investigation into the events of 9/11, and they only gave the 9/11 commission about 3 million dollars! We spent about 30 million investigating bill clintons zipper-gate affair. It was a white wash.

The commission was supposedly "bi-partisan" thats a bunch of crap. we need to re-investigate 9/11 with an INDEPENDENT board of members.

There have been demonstrations and protests nationwide about the commission, without any coverage from any major media. There was a protest where thousands of people threw the 9/11 commission report into the boston bay, just like the boston tea party. NO MEDIA SHOWED UP! on 9/11 last year, There were thousands of people there protesting at ground zero on September 11, 2006, and the cameras stayed on George Bush putting flowers at ground zero. The national media has been complicit with the government ever since 9/11 in keeping the majority of the public unaware that there is a huge movement in the united states (36% of the population, according to a scientific zogby poll last year believe total inside job, and 80% believe there was a cover up) and other countries of the belief that the world trade center towers and building 7 were brought down in a controlled demolition. Many of them think that all the conspiracy theories involve crazy notions, i.e."missile hit the pentagon, not a plane!" or "there were missile pods on the planes!"
The missile hoax was a rumor that was started by donald rumsfeld, in an interview with parade magazine, in which he said, " ". and they are never going to release those tapes that show the plane, because they want to keep these ridiculous rumors going because they discredit the truth movement.

here is a website that will better explain this:
http://www.oilempire.us/pentagon.html
or
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/ppfinal.html

there is so much evidence of this, and we need to ask ourselves, why hasn't this been reported on?

Answer 2

Right over here man!!! It's totally bogus. They don't talk about building 7, they failed to mention that the towers had the 47steel pillars that made up the center structure of the building. Trying to tell us that a huge fireball careened down the center of the building weakening all the steel.

Sure doesn't explain the huge explosion that happened 13-17sec prior to the impact of the first plane. Doesn't explain how a huge 50ton piece of machinery in the basement was obliterated. Doesn't explain how jet fuel(even with the office materials in the building at the time) could melt steel. Jet fuel in open air would burn at around 1300-1400deg F. Steel doesn't begin to weaken till 2800deg F. The fact that there was molten steel running down the side of the building indicating (after heavy research by Steven E. Jones, Phyicist from BYU, one of the founders of Schollars for 9/11 truth) that the material Thermite was used to cut the steel pillars in the building at a very accelerated rate. The fact that no steel structure has ever collapsed due to fire. Take the building in Madrid that burned for 19+hrs with white hot flames shooting hundreds of feet into the air with temps higher than that recorded from 9/11, and still the main structure held fast.

That whole commision report is a cheap way for our govt. to cover up what they were responsible for while amazingly winning the trust of millions of Americans.

Answer 3

The tin foil hat crowd

Answer 4

What are they hiding from us?