English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-03-02 08:22:02 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Elections

18 answers

Hopefully, whoever gets the most votes.
Giuliani is arrogant, bigoted, ill tempered and a womanizer. He divorced his 2nd wife, Donna Hanover, by announcing it at a press conference instead of telling her in person first. He was having an affair with an aide while living at Gracie Mansion & while still married and mayor of NYC while taking credit for all the good things that were done by others in “the city”. He fired William Bratton; the police commissioner in 1994 when he found out he made the cover of Time magazine because he (Giuliani) wanted to take the credit for the innovative crime fighting. I lived in NY during his dictatorship, and believe me, I would not want him as president. His character is far worse than Bush & Clinton's worse faults rolled into one, if you can believe that's possible. His name should be Mussoliani.

As for 9/11…. he’s no hero, he just happened to be in the right place at the right time. The real heroes of 9/11 were the NYC firefighters & police plus all the other forces from the surrounding tri-state areas who voluntarily came to pitch in & help us.

OK, here’s a link from Newsweek:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17081159/sit...

2007-03-02 08:52:33 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Probably McCain, unless a conservative runs as a third candidate. Then it will be anyone the Democrats roll out.

The only chance Hillary will win is if a third candidate comes out. Her support base was, is, and always will be aorund 43-46%. She will get ZERO swing votes, which you need to win a presidential election. But if that third person is in and does a Ross Perot, 43-46% will be enough to win it.

2007-03-02 08:31:17 · answer #2 · answered by irish_giant 4 · 0 0

I think its a toss up right now. Either way around it, this election will be one for the history books because all of the candidates bring a new issue to the table.

Personally, I want Mitt Romney. Aside from the fact that I am pro stem cell research and he is not, he has great values and a proven record of success. I mean the man fathered a company that has helped form countless outrageously successful businesses in our society. He has a solid marriage and great family values, which leads me to believe he will fight for our families. Romney stands up for his beliefs...that means he is a man of greta integrity and character. You have to respect him for that! Besides wouldn't you rather spend the next presidency focusing on the real issues ( iraq, economy, healthcare, etc) instead of presidential scandals? I sure would!

2007-03-02 10:10:28 · answer #3 · answered by angelic_monster04 2 · 0 0

Hillary Clinton

2007-03-02 09:11:27 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Whoever gets the most votes. Oh, wait a minute. Al Gore got the most votes in 2000 and some idiot is now in the White House. Humm, so I guess it will be whoever has the most money to buy the election or have it "fixed", again,

2007-03-02 08:28:28 · answer #5 · answered by Brite Tiger 6 · 2 2

I think it's going to be Rudy...He did so many great things with New York, look at how well he handled everything after 9/11.
He is in the lead right now and I think he will stay there.

2007-03-02 08:39:10 · answer #6 · answered by Melissa F 1 · 0 1

I wonder if there will be an election?, is more like it.
The Second Advent of Christ could be happening by them.
The Rapture is imminent and transcendent.
Peace out.

2007-03-02 12:19:50 · answer #7 · answered by Lucy 3 · 0 0

Hillary Clinton unfortunately. Why can't the Democrats put up a viable candidate who can end the war, cut spending and help us explore new energy alternatives. Instead we get plain old, vascilating, right wing Hillary.

2007-03-02 08:26:02 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Probably Hillary, Great, more "travel gate", "Slick Willy" acting like an Alley Cat, and Hillary hooking up with "Stretch Pelosi" so we can hand over the U.S. to the 3rd world, I can hear the "Banjo's" warming up already !

2007-03-02 08:27:20 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

probably Giuliani the idiot democrats keep fighting each other and the only one of them that would be a good president wont get the nomination because all they want is popularity....how bout putting the best man for the job up......and you might win........cuz clinton will not get it done and neither will obama......if the democrats are smart ..........and they are not.......they would give the nomination to EDWARDS........if not expect another loss in 08

2007-03-02 08:29:48 · answer #10 · answered by Philip C 2 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers