http://dsc.discovery.com/convergence/tomb/tomb.html
Did they hide or skip original Bible from cave were they found? Documentary claims discovery of tomb of Jesus, wife and son...
2007-03-02
08:17:45
·
8 answers
·
asked by
health_message_to_all
1
in
Arts & Humanities
➔ History
There is must be some Bibles documents or some scripts left behind Jesus Tomb and they skipped because today’s Bible scripts different and cause big clouds or revolution comes to Christianity...
2007-03-02
08:29:00 ·
update #1
I don't say it is false It happen and possible because Jesus was human and no human can alive after some period.
These are the last days of earth life lots discover before your new journey start...
2007-03-02
08:37:18 ·
update #2
This 'tomb' was 'found' in the same place as the James ossuary a couple of years ago. That tomb was the subject of a documentary on Discovery as a "this will change everything" type of sleezo-mentary. Subsequently, it was found that the discoverers had made the whole thing up.
Proving that they learned their lesson, Discovery hired James Cameron to make a "this will change everything" sleezo-mentary on this newly 'discovered' Jesus tomb. In a few months, they will find out it is a fraud also.
It doesn't matter to them. They sell the advertising, and they get viewers to watch.
2007-03-02 08:27:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by Nicnac 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
There is a lot of misunderstanding on how the Bible has been preserved over the millenia. We have several ancient copies of the Bible in part or totality from several different places in the Ancient World. Only parts of the Bible were found in the caves of the Essenes. Nothing has been hidden or skipped.
The original Bible (that is the first copy ever written) doesn't exist. For one thing, the Bible was written over a period of about 1500 years by numerous authors. Some of the authors are known by name and in history and some are not known by name. The Hebrew people were very very particular about copying the Scriptures which made up the Bible. One mistake on a page and the whole page was destroyed. Because of this we have very good documentation for the authenticity of those Scriptures we have today. There is more variation in the N.T., but again, there is not so much variation as to cause significant problems, and none to affect the foundations of the faith of believers in Christ.
The documentary has been discredited already by those who have much greater archaeolical knowledge of the times and the tombs than the maker of the documentary. The name Jesus,
or Yeshua, or Joshua (all forms of the same name) is one which has been popular for thousands of years. And the Bible is very clear that Jesus never married, that he was put into a new tomb never before used, and that he arose from the dead on the third day. This is foundational to Christian belief. For in his death he defeated death. And the hope of the resurrection is basedon this, that he who was without sin became sin for us that we might be made the righteousness of God in Him. If He be not resurrected, there is no resurrection. Those who dislike the Christian faith will look everywhere to disprove it. Most don't even know what is written in this collection of 66 books we call the Bible.
Maggie
2007-03-02 08:36:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Several years ago I hear about a picture of the virgin Mary crying in a church. The church was crowded with media from different handles. It so happened that the wall was condensating where this picture was and caused this kind of drama. In my opinion, if you are a scientific person you believe in evolution, anthropology, and other scienctific research, then this kind of stuff is for you. On the hand, if you believe in the bible, creation, the Alpha and the Omega then let no man deceive you.
2007-03-02 08:50:05
·
answer #3
·
answered by Reidi 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
They did not find any original bibles in the cave where the reported "body of Jesus" was found.
The evidence that it is Jesus Christ body is weak and circumsantial. The sarcophogus the body was found in said "Jesus" but Jesus Christ was not the only person in history to have that name.
2007-03-02 08:22:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by glenn 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
i do no longer propose to be rude, yet many do no longer evaluate the certainty that early translators have been clever. If Egyptians incredibly outfitted the pyramids then the early bible translation had to have been your best option. No Jesus under no circumstances had a spouse, in spite of the undeniable fact that it fairly is attainable that Jesus' coffin replaced into reused after ressurection. i'm incredibly beneficial many human beings fail to realize words and dialects would have replaced. extra advantageous than possibly we are making a corrupted version of the bible.
2016-12-14 09:08:47
·
answer #5
·
answered by fette 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The first Bible was the first book ever published on the printing press, the man who discovered it is the #1 in a list of inventors. Who is he? He invented the best ink and best type-his name was Johann Gutenburg and he printed the first Bible in 1450.
2007-03-02 08:23:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by dtwladyhawk 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Jesus never had a sexual relationship with any woman. His proper dwelling place was in heaven. He as God's begotton Son came to the Earth not to marry and procreate but to teach and offer himself as a sacrifice for our sins. The accusation that Jesus had a sexual relationship with Mary Magdeline is false and insulting to both.
2007-03-02 08:31:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Who is "they"? What "original " Bible? What on earth are you talking about? The Bible used today was not put together and sanctioned until the 4th century AD
2007-03-02 08:21:47
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋