Tales of non binding resolutions.....
2007-03-02 07:53:00 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
They never came to the consensus that they would cut funding. Cons are the ones who assumed it is what they would do.
2007-03-02 08:03:32 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
they are a pro-war party! they used the war for political gain, yet they do nothing. They wouldn't end the war if they could! and they can! Hillary, Barak, John Edwards, Guliani, McCain are all PRO-WAR!!!! the government just doesn't listen to the people who elected them anymore! this is the end of America being a free country. The country is now run by corporate interest. That is the definition of FASCISM - CORPORATISM!!!!
2007-03-02 16:12:07 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
"Tales of non binding resolutions"? Isn't that the title of Hillary's new autobiography
or maybe John Kerry's
or Nancy Pelosi
or Obama
2007-03-02 15:59:02 · answer #3 · answered by Centurion529 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
"Tales of non binding resolutions" - Awesome!!! Awesome to the MAX!
2007-03-02 16:00:16 · answer #4 · answered by type2negative 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's hard to clean a kitchen that one monkey and one pig have been messing up for 7 years. Or a house. The white one.
2007-03-02 15:57:22 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Well, they're morally against the war....they just can't agree to stop it.
2007-03-02 16:08:14 · answer #6 · answered by Michael E 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋