Wasn't the land the Jews before them, then they stole it, then Christians had it, then they got it back, etc. This land has been going back and forth between groups for thousands of years, what makes the Arabs think they have any more of a right to it than anyone else?
2007-03-02 07:27:08 · 31 answers · asked by Matt 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Jose, i know arabs aren't a religion. however there are mostly muslims in palestine, but also a christian minority that want the holy land too. maybe i should have phrased that better
2007-03-02 07:33:10 · update #1
because they killed the jews and drove the rest out of Israel
2007-03-02 07:30:29 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 5⤋
You're pretty much right except you left out the fact the the Islamic religion has only been around since the 6th century. I never have been able to figure out how a person can "own" land. The only reason that we have very very rich people here and the US is, for the greatest part, because their ancestors stole more land than did the other fellows. I hate that people can "will" land to others. It should revert back to the government and be resold after the person dies for somebody else to use it. Wouldn't that put a stink in the rich and their domination of the world. It doesn't matter what country you're talking about, Holy Land or Land Fill, it would even the playing field just a bit.
Now, on you're question; They feel they have a right to it even though they were the last religion to move in their because of the wealth and because they are there. If people really took a look at Islam they would see that it a corrupt and foul religion that spreads nothing but hate and discontent to all it touches. For some reason it is politically correct here in the US to dump on the Hebe's and the Christians but not the murdering Muslims; I don't know why this is.
If you find out, let me know.
2007-03-02 07:40:48 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Before anybody asks a question OR answers questions you had better do a little homework. In reading the answers to the question and reading the question it is fairly clear that no one knows what they are really talking about. There are the Jews practicing the Jewish faith, there is Zionism, how many of you even know what that is, and there is Islam and Christianity. These forces are polarizing the world. You figure out who are the bad guys and who are the good guys. Don't believe what you hear on TV or read in the papers either.
We stole our land from the American Indians and the Mexicans. I think the Latinos are going to get it back too. They are building a very powerful lobby.
Do some homework people.
2007-03-02 09:16:18 · answer #3 · answered by ARE BEE 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Because the Arabs believe that Mohammad ascended to heaven at the Dome of the Rock, the Dome of the Rock was built over the Temple of Solomon, The three main religions get their religion from the Jews, but the Arabs don't believe that at all. They want to get rid of the Jews, but turn around and say they love Abraham, Moses and Jesus, all Jews, their like the KKK that say they love G-D and believe in Jesus, but hate Jews, dose not make since. Before Jesus returns the Temple will have to be rebuilt and that means the Dome of the Rock will have to be torn down, so their will be another big war in the future, the Muslims will go nuts. Their will be no peace until Jesus returns. P.S. Israel is the only land on earth that was actually given by G-D to a people, and he give it to Abraham and his descendants.
2007-03-02 08:01:32 · answer #4 · answered by hexa 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The reason Arabs want "Palestine" is because the Masonic fraternity back in the mideval ages fought for it -- on the muslim side was King Sahalidin (sp). Arabs and Jews and Christans all claim it as the one true "Holy Land".
Masons protected the Christian priests who were themselves conducting drives to bring Christianity to the middle east. It took hold for a few decades, but then King Sahalidan and his armies took a bunch of land and eventually after much fighting over several hundred years, pushed the Knights Templar out of what is today referred to "Palestine" -- the (masonic or in Arab eyes Christian based ) temple mount. Muslims tore down the masonic temple and installed their own mosque directly on top of it, just as a nice personal "**** you" to the West.
Arabs are still fighting today for the same reason they fought the masons a few hundred years ago. To the Arab world it's all about world domination...It's not just about getting "Palestine" under their belt, it's about making the whole world subservient to their cause -- if you're not muslim, you're a "caffer" in their words, which means literally if they kill you, they won't go to hell for doing it...
This is not a new war. Arabs now want to finish what they originally started hundreds of years ago.
Just info, when one soldier killed the other, he did a draw-and-quarter to the other soldier, separating ALL body parts and buried them in different places -- just like Arabs do today to foreigners -- the masons did it too, they were a VERY fiersome and formidable group of armies led by the Pope, but then again they had never been quite a gruesome and gory as muslim "armies" are today...
Make no mistake - Today, muslims DO intend to rule the world. They are out for blood...
2007-03-02 07:47:41 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
The jews built Jerusalem in about at least 2000 B.C.
The MUSLIMS invaded Jerusalem in about 680 A.D.
The CHRISTIANS embarked on the crusades to take back Jerusalem and safegaurd it for the jews and christians in about 1100, but then the Muslims invaded again a hundred years later.
The basic fact is, the Jews built Jerusalem, it belongs to them.
Actually, I think there are several cities in this world that needs to be NUKED so people will stop fighting over "holy lands".
Jerusalem, The Vatican, Mecca and Baghdad.
Of course, if we do that, they'll just go fight somewhere else...
2007-03-02 07:38:40 · answer #6 · answered by The Oldest Soul 3 · 2⤊ 3⤋
well, maybe you should do more research before asking. arabs and jews are decendants of abraham. so, 1000s of years ago befor the religions started, a common ancestor was living there. before islam there were arabs living there but most were jewish or christian, later on most coverted to islam
2007-03-02 14:09:05 · answer #7 · answered by CRAYZICUZ 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Muslims believe they practice the perfect religion, have the perfect culture, and have a perfect right to kill you if you disagree. The hate of the islamics for the rest of the world is not just about the holy land but about any area that is not controlled by their hate cult
2007-03-02 07:31:37 · answer #8 · answered by espreses@sbcglobal.net 6 · 3⤊ 3⤋
it truly is ironic. At one time the Arabs in that area refused to allow themselves to be stated as "palestinian." They denied any validity to the time period "palestine." yet, Arafat helped create and popularized the "id" of a "Palestinian Arab" human beings as a rhetorical weapon contained in the conflict with Israel. apparently, the UNRWA, particularly redefined the legal definition of "refugee" for the Palestinian Arabs (and no man or woman else before or because) in this kind of fashion that maximizes the variety of human beings which could in good structure the definition. If the UN had no longer redefined the that technique of the note, there could be very few "Palestinian refugees." For another solutions revealed: regardless of the truth that right this moment's Jews are an identical human beings because the Biblical Jews (as shown by technique of Non-Jewish historic previous, Jewish historic previous, and genetic attempting out), even if it truly is genuine or no longer is beside the point for Israel, the state. in reality Arabs moved in and "took" sources. Jews legally bought or rented sources. 80% of Palestine became granted independence in 1946 and grew to develop into Arab-in reality and Jew-loose. the perfect 20% of Palestine became chop up and those aspects with majority Jewish inhabitants were placed aside for Israel. it truly is democracy. And if someone from la adjustments their call to an English one you do not could call them lord. yet, in the journey that they flow to England and get citizenship, they get to vote. And if an Englishman strikes to la and receives citizenship the following, they get to vote. And if sufficient of them flow and get citizenship such that they develop into the final public...they get to vote for who they prefer and administration the governmentby using their votes. you're literally not getting to promote them your residences and then attempt to kill them, save the money and the living house because you declare they are "English and in no way 'genuine' individuals." And it became incorrect of the Arabs to attempt this or attempt to attempt this to Jews in Palestine.
2016-12-05 03:58:01 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
for the same reason the jews and the christians do. having been there, I don't see much of a difference between the desires of the three sides. It's all religious rubbish, and it will be the end of this world as we know it.
2007-03-02 07:31:14 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
When we all put land and material goods ahead of the well-being of other humans, we are all wrong. How crazy is it to kill over who is the most holy?
2007-03-02 07:30:56 · answer #11 · answered by doktordbel 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋