English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-03-02 07:19:06 · 12 answers · asked by Paul A 2 in Politics & Government Politics

12 answers

I don't think there will be any winners.

2007-03-02 07:21:20 · answer #1 · answered by Jack 3 · 0 0

It really depends on who is fighting in the war. You have to think that the world in which we live today is a lot different than the world in the WW2 period. Today is weapons that are so advanced and nulcular weapons it would depend who wiped the other off the face of the map first. Which in turn would send radioactive material in the atmosphere and it would get in the jet stream and travel the planet. If we ever had a world war again we would destroy our own planet. The weapon and technology use would be the desider.

2007-03-02 15:24:52 · answer #2 · answered by Lighting Bolt 7 2 · 0 0

A world war where nuclear weapons are used would last only a few hours and we would manage to eliminate the human race, so there would be no winner. You can't win if you are dead.

2007-03-02 15:29:16 · answer #3 · answered by msi_cord 7 · 0 0

We would come closest to "winning" a nuclear war. We would be the only 1's likely to survive.

2007-03-02 15:29:19 · answer #4 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 0 1

the new world order would win.
the war on terrorism is a war on our freedom and sovereignty.
the north american union is step one of many that will end in world government.

"The term Internationalism has been popularized in recent years to cover an interlocking financial, political, and economic world force for the purpose of establishing a World Government. Today Internationalism is heralded from pulpit and platform as a 'League of Nations' or a 'Federated Union' to which the United States must surrender a definite part of its National Sovereignty. The World Government plan is being advocated under such alluring names as the 'New International Order,' 'The New World Order,' 'World Union Now,' 'World Commonwealth of Nations,' 'World Community,' etc. All the terms have the same objective; however, the line of approach may be religious or political according to the taste or training of the individual." Excerpt from A Memorial to be Addressed to the House of Bishops and the House of Clerical and Lay Deputies of the Protestant Episcopal Church in General Convention (October 1940) .


"Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order [referring to the 1991 LA Riot]. Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were an outside threat from beyond [i.e., an "extraterrestrial" invasion], whether real or *promulgated* [emphasis mine], that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this *scenario*, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government." Dr. Henry Kissinger, Bilderberger Conference, Evians, France, 1991.

"The idea was that those who direct the overall conspiracy could use the differences in those two so-called ideologies [ marxism / fascism / socialism v. democracy / capitalism] to enable them [the Illuminati] to divide larger and larger portions of the human race into opposing camps so that they could be armed and then brainwashed into fighting and destroying each other." Myron Fagan.

"We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the work is now much more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in past centuries." David Rockefeller, founder of the Trilateral Commission, in an address to a meeting of The Trilateral Commission, in June, 1991.

"If there are those who think we are to jump immediately into a new world order, actuated by complete understanding and brotherly love, they are doomed to disappointment. If we are ever to approach that time, it will be after patient and persistent effort of long duration. The present international situation of mistrust and fear can only be corrected by a formula of equal status, continuously applied, to every phase of international contacts, until the cobwebs of the old order are brushed out of the minds of the people of all lands." Dr. Augustus O. Thomas, president of the World Federation of Education Associations (August 1927), quoted in the book International Understanding: Agencies Educating for a New World (1931) .


"The depression was the calculated 'shearing' of the public by the World Money powers, triggered by the planned sudden shortage of supply of call money in the New York money market....The One World Government leaders and their ever close bankers have now acquired full control of the money and credit machinery of the U.S. via the creation of the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank." Curtis Dall, FDR's son-in-law as quoted in his book, My Exploited Father-in-Law

"The New World Order will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down...but in the end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece will accomplish much more than the old fashioned frontal assault." CFR member Richard Gardner, writing in the April l974 issue of the CFR's journal, Foreign Affairs.


Terrorism is the "promulgated" threat that Dr. Kissinger was speaking of in 1991.

I believe that 9/11 was a CIA / FBI psy-op (psychological operation) on the american people. It was necessary for it to be done, in order for the New World Order to eventually be established.

I hope we can wake enough people up before this thing gets any further...

VOTE RON PAUL in 2008, because he is a constitutional libertarian, and he would stop the new world order from advancing their causes during his time in office. He will secure the border, he will follow the constitution, he will stop the north american union, he will fix the fiat currency system that is causing the dollar to crash, which will give them a reason to make the north american union (with the amero).

i am a realist. i look at what these powerful men have said and i look at their goals. Ron Paul is a very reasonal man. he has never said that 9/11 was an inside job or anything like that. But he's the best chance we have got to stop these people.

2007-03-02 15:28:30 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Iran

2007-03-02 15:22:56 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

whoever gets nuked last wins

2007-03-02 15:21:00 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It depends on the teams. I call skins!

2007-03-02 15:21:03 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

There would be no winners. We all would soon be nuked and fried.

2007-03-02 15:21:52 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

If it sever enough the insects.

2007-03-02 15:21:24 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers