Do think that employers should give convicted felons ( robbery) a chance?

Question

If a person commited a crime 12 or 13 yrs ago should that mistake still be held against that person?

Answer 1

I feel that if employers refuse to give repentant felons a chance as employees, felons will have not choice but to revert back to their past behaviors just to feed themselves and/or their families.

Answer 2

There are some super arguments here. super question Curious. As a retired Cop it could ask your self some that have a tendency to bypass the way of Mountain guy in this undertaking. there's a undertaking with a individual paying their debt to society, yet residing something of their lives as a 2d type citizen, because of the fact we forget that they are in a position to't vote the two. i can work out the place they might have a loss of loyalty to the community and this could bring about a sparkling violation. I additionally see some credence with preserving firearms out of the palms of those of convicted violent crimes, which by potential of how we already do with those convicted of considerable different and babies Violence. even however, pondering how uncomplicated that's for a individual to get set up on an considerable different and babies Violence rap, I surely have some doubts approximately this regulation. i could perchance see a a million 3 hundred and sixty 5 days waiting era, or something comparable. What I worry the main is that the government is determining a thank you to disarm the familiar public one phase at a time. in basic terms look at their helpful marketing campaign to ostracize tobacco consumers. whilst they spoil the rights of one phase, whilst will they be after yours. a individual charged with killing somebody whilst below the effect of alcohol driving can at last get their license returned and purchase a sparkling vehicle. isn't there something hypocritical approximately this. i don't see any huge differences interior the close to destiny, yet this makes for healthy debate. i think of our criminal equipment, like a number of good church, needs an outstanding reformation on social accumulating. i might strongly propose all human beings to stop transforming into a member of the government in stripping the rights from different communities, regardless in case you like them or not. or you're purely a device of the propaganda.

Answer 3

Well it would depend on the actual crime. Was there a weapon involved, were there injuries? How much participation did this individual have in the crime? Did they admit to it later and have they completed some form of punishment?

Was this their only offense?

What job ar they applying for now? What is their credit rating like now?

I would have hesitations but I would look at the overall situation and make a well informed decision.

Answer 4

not only are they dishonest, they were bad enough at it to get caught. That said, there are jobs that dont involve them being around money or goods and ones in which they will be supervised, so why not? I sure wouldnt want them driving a brinks truck by themselves, but i wouldnt mind letting one work with a group doing some kind of manual labor or something.

Answer 5

Everybody deserves a chance to prove their rehabilitation. Especially since it was that long ago. But if they are a 2 or 3 time screw up, I can see why people would be afraid to trust them.

Answer 6

That's why the federal government enacted the Equal Opportunity Employer act.

:)

Answer 7

I think it depends on the position they are applying for and their crime. Yes, they should be given a chance, but not for every possible position.

Answer 8

I think that people deserve an opportunity to gain a livelihood by honest means.

Answer 9

everyone deserves a 2nd chance, if not u will committ another crime just tryin 2 stay alive

Answer 10

you have to judge the person yourself as to how you can trust anyone, just cause someone hasn't been caught doesn't mean they're good people. also for society, they'll have to rob again if nothing else is available.