I frequently see or hear RedsStaters claiming the US Army is responsiable for many altruistic acoumplishments in Iraq, Like building schools, rebuilding hospitals, Feed and clothing children, repairing irriagation and fresh water systems, revitalizing communities, The list is vast.
Yet these same public works if carried out in America would be dispicable acts of liberalism.
Save the Baghdad and destroy the New Orlean. It's as crazy as save the seals and abort the babies.
I simply don't understand the douality of RedsStaters.
2007-03-02 06:57:39 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Damn shortbus, this is the first time I've agreed with you. Screw bagdad and the seals and lets see America do something for America for a change. I don't understand either. Everyone is so scared of a handout here in america and all we do is shove mony to all these other stinking countrys like Iraq, North korea and of course the stinking Isrealaties as though we owe them something. Vote me for president and the 1st thing I'll do is cut these co*k suckers off and tell them "they need to work 80hr. weeks and support yourself the way we have to. I don't get it and never have why we have to save the ungrateful world.
2007-03-02 07:11:38 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
There are schools, hospitals, clothed and fed children, irrigation, fresh water, and vitalized communities in the red states. These are all qualities of a civilized society, im sorry to inform you that the socialists do not own these issues, they are owned by all civilized countries. your question is a red herring. Now, if the Army was working to carry out a redistribution of wealth in Iraq, or socializing their healthcare system, or if the army were making it easier for 12 yr old iraqi girls to have abortions without their parents knowledge or consent, or if the army were working hard to legalize gay marriage in iraq, then yes there may be some inconsistencies.
2007-03-02 07:06:08 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
First of all, altruism is not a liberal virtue. Conservatives are the most generous when it comes to contributing their own time and money to help others. Your assertion that helping to rebuild a country after the ravages of war is akin to handing out money to people who live in the wealthiest country in the world is laughable.
Since we're talking about hypocrisy, explain to me why human rights in Iraq mean nothing to liberals? The left could care less that Saddam was conducting a systematic genocide of Kurds in Iraq. Doesn't gassing, torturing, and killing thousands of Kurds fall somewhere on the liberal list of human rights violations?
2007-03-02 07:07:45 · answer #3 · answered by VoodooPunk 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
YES! Lets rebuild a city under sea level so we can feed more hurricane "victims".
By the way I know at my school that 3,200 people are going down to New Orleans to repair or help during Spring Break on government funding.
2007-03-02 07:03:31 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
REAL ANSWER
Question: Why do the RedsStaters consistently call everyone they don't understand or agree with "Liberal"???
Question Details: Abu: Not an answer! Reason: Most ignorant redder than red Conservatives cant answer questions about their outlandish claim that red is so much better than blue.So they react. Hence predictable non-answers like Abu's.
Deleted Answer: Abu: Not an answer! Reason: Most ignorant redder than red Conservatives cant answer questions about their outlandish claim that red is so much better than blue.So they react. Hence predictable non-answers like Abu's.
Reason of Violation:Not a Question or Answer
2007-03-02 07:34:54 · answer #5 · answered by Da Man 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ah. More foolish generalizations about conservatives by ill-informed people.
We made a choice to go in and do these things for people who had been ground under the heel of a dictator for decades. We ask our current government to build roads, schools, and provide reasonable, short-term support for those in need. We support the same in Iraq (and we'd like the liberal media to tell the world about it). We just don't like excessive give-aways or those that go to one group within that governed area and not another. We like for people to have opportunity to make their own choices, and suceed of fail based on them. Stop spreading the propaganda.
2007-03-02 07:10:41 · answer #6 · answered by Mike K 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, it isn't. The cornerstone of liberal ideology is rigidity. Your Democrat neighbor opt for to provide your different neighbor YOUR coat after taking it from you at gunpoint. You knew that. you also knew you may't shield YOUR ideology with out dishonesty.
2016-11-27 00:30:20 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They want to have their war and make it look all happy too, while cutting Aid to Dependent Children and letting kids go hungry here in the US. Hypocrites.
2007-03-02 07:04:50 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Simply put...we are trying to help a country come out of 3rd world status.....they need us more than New Orleans....
2007-03-02 07:04:41 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Please show me a single "red stater" who has complained about feeding and clothing children.
Please show me a single "red stater" who has complained about building schools or rebuilding hospitals.
Please show me a single "red stater" who has complained about repaiting irrigation and fresh water systems.
What you don't understand could fill a canyon.
2007-03-02 07:02:12 · answer #10 · answered by C = JD 5 · 4⤊ 3⤋