controlled demolition. Plain and simple, from one camera angle you can see the squibs going off from bottom to top, you can see the crimp in the middle showing how the center column was blown. The fact that it came down in 6.5sec. The 2 BBC reports of it already being collapsed before it happened. The CNN clip of firefighters and policemen telling others to stand back because the building was going down, they're going to pull the building, they've got bombs in there.
Some will argue that if indeed they did pull the building, that they could've done that when it was on fire. WRONG!!! A controlled demolition of that magnitude takes weeks of preparation. The fact that there was molten metal underneath this building as well as the towers suspects the further use of Thermite to cut the steel pillars. The fact that no steel structure has ever collapsed due to fire(here where a few dumbies will argue the whole Popular Mechanics article where they talked about this wood building with a tar roof in Chicago collapsed from fire. WOOD). The fact that the lease holder Larry Silverstein said that he recieved a call from the fire commander saying that they weren't going to be able to control the fires. And he says how we've already suffered a terrible loss of life and that the best option would be to "pull" it. And they pulled it and we watched the building collapse.
The simple fact is that there were only 2 small fires in the 5th and 8th floors of the building is bogus. That would've been a no hassle job. The bigger question was that Mr. Silverstein said he was refering to the firefighters to be pulled away from the building, when in fact they were not in there, no one was in there to speak of.
So what was in Building 7 anyway? How about Guiliani's safe bunker that could withstand many thousands of deg. F heat, FBI, CIA and other Govt. officials command centers. So the biggest thing going on now is Was that the control center for rigging 9/11? Looks that way, since they'd have the best vantage point of everything going on at that time. I don't know for certain, but it does make a lot of sense on the matter.
2007-03-02 08:27:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by Ted S 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
The concrete was turned to dust and the buildings fell faster than the laws of gravity. This could only have been caused by explosives. People in the basement of the trade center said a bomb went off down there before the plane hit. That doesn't mean the government did it. It just means that things didn't happen like they said and everyone, including the firemen who survived that day, is under a gag order. Very suspicious and definitely should be investigated by an outside source.
2007-03-02 10:28:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by BekindtoAnimals22 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
If you really want to know what is going on in the government in the Big picture, the first thing you need to do is check out the Jesuit General....and the Black Pope. There is also a book out there called the Vatican Assassins that will blow your mind!!
No one country is running the world...the Jesuit General has been in control of everything since the 1500's. So even the towers and 911 was a planned deal. Also, check out the list of people who are part of it and you will be shocked....from Joseph Kennedy, who was in on having his own son assassinated, to George Bush Sr. and Bill Clinton. It will give you a whole new outlook on where this world is headed, and soon. The best you can do is to find Christ, and prepare for the Rapture....no lie!!
2007-03-02 07:34:24
·
answer #3
·
answered by Patti n 1
·
2⤊
1⤋
This has been demo'ed on tv a hundred times. The weight from the top floors as they were falling, caused each floors beams to give way and it was a domino effect. It was even demo'ed with a model based on the same cheap construction that the WTC buildings contractor used. Most high rise buildings have the elevator in the middle which help with the load bearing.The WTC did not. Also, the buildingd were built with a cheap outside framing system that was not tied into the flooring as most buildings are.
2007-03-02 07:39:35
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Its about a precision prediction made at 5:00 PM by Photographer Tom Franklin and other news organizations mainly the BBC.
http://investigatesandyhook.blogspot.com/2013/11/new-wtc-7-pull-it-slip-up-by.html
After that
Daniel Nigro, Chief of Department for the FDNY; and Shabtai Shavit, a former Director of Israel's intelligence agency Mossad. Mr. Woolsey named together.
http://www.nyc.gov/html/fdny/html/press/james_woosley.html
2013-11-26 11:26:43
·
answer #5
·
answered by Dan 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
It was intentionally demolished. Buildings don't collapse unless there's a design flaw, massive damage from earthquake, or engineered demolition.
WTC7 was undamaged by falling debris from WTC1 and WTC2, and its fires were minor. WTC7's design was more conventional box steel construction and much smaller. Those kinds of buildings simply don't collapse. They can burn for days and the steel structure stays intact. The only way to knock them down is to blow the massive steel pilings that hold it up by using cutter charges at an angle. Evidence was found of the angled cuts on the support columns, but the building debris was cut up and shipped off to china.
2007-03-02 09:15:05
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Planes crashed into the buildings. You must have missed the news that day. How many times do you plan to keep spamming Y/A with the same questions?
2007-03-02 09:53:09
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
i imagine Sri Vidya Rajgopalan has given the perfect answer. besides the undeniable fact that the answer is quite lengthy. allow me clarify you in short. Ram equipped a Bridge somewhat of deliver because he concept, if contained in the conflict with Ravana extra military of Varana is needed then that is going to likely be ordinary to deliver reinforcement by a Bridge Than to deliver deliver.
2016-10-17 09:55:57
·
answer #8
·
answered by haberstroh 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
it is all a lie
I did 9/11
I flew out of a frozen over hell on my pig on our way to pie in the sky next to the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow protected by a unicorn
Makes as much sense as the GOV did it
It was Nazislamic Fascist who did it
loosen the hat of tin foil
2007-03-02 07:05:50
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
It was the same people that staged Pearl Harbor .
You truly need to be ashamed of yourself .
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html
2007-03-02 13:11:02
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋