Please think for a moment before answering this...
Consider all the various attacks on things that we have taken for granted....
Consider the downright denial of torture whilst we find that this administration has been doing exactly that.
Is there anything that we can not expect these people to attempt.
The most dangerous of all is the question.... WHY?
2007-03-02 06:39:32 · 38 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Rick D... Doesn't it make you ashamed of some Americans... Never ashamed of America, but some of the people who occupy the land have lost all sense of morality and the spirit that made it great.
2007-03-02 07:47:07 · update #1
I read all the prevoius response to this Question and have to ask my own ARE ALL OF YOU STUIPED?????? Ok Im a republican I voted for reagan I voted for bush senior I also voted clinton and then for Jr . Afgan was nessary they attacked us first well they didnt but protected the one who did . But JR is the new hitler of this world. Torture is unacceptable the holding of prisoners with out trail is unacceptable . The patrioc act Ais UNLAWFUL and most of you say this is all in the cause of peace guess thats what the nazi army used to tell themselves to FOOL themselves . American people are sheep so afraid to lead content just to follow
2007-03-02 07:11:24 · answer #1 · answered by Rick 3 · 1⤊ 4⤋
N O!!!!!!! The Clinton and Carter Administrations
were the most dangerous along with the
Kennedy/Johnson Administrations with Vietnam!!
2007-03-02 07:19:53 · answer #2 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
1. The Carter Administration Incompetent deified.
2. The Clinton Adminstration, North Korea got the bomb, China was provided with MIRVING capability for their rockets, and had 13 chances to kill OBL and the true story will never be known because of the CONTENTS of Sandy The Documents are in my pants Berger. Janet Reno was not too bad Using M1A1 Abrams Tanks on American Citizens and sending his Black Shirts to give Castro a child.
2007-03-02 06:58:00 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
of route no longer. Your claims are pretend, you so-observed as data are lies, and your accusations in accordance with misdirection. Obama does no longer make unfounded statements about Britain, his statements were frequently functional, the U. S. and Britain are nevertheless the most efficient of allies. Obama has been rightly serious of BP, because they violated this style of large volume of protection guidelines and were no longer waiting for a deep water oil spill, even although they claimed it become possibility-free. that is likely the corporate will face criminal prices of negligence. To confuse grievance of a company for grievance of a u . s . is the act of propagandist hack and makes me doubt your sincerity. extra the concept that yet another questioner had about our relationships being disrupted via the change of a few presents is absurd. kin between international locations will be stated via the billions in commerce, visits, economic flows, and protection force engagements which have linked our u . s . for better than one hundred years. those connections are not any more going to vanish because of a few delusion someone has of Obama. some racist delusion, i'd be tempted to operate.
2016-11-27 00:29:35 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes it is the most dangerous by far and believe me that is a fact. It has got to a point that they do not want the public to give an opinion about the leadership, to do so is almost asking for trouble. I don't know if you recall, but a teenager was addressed by the FBI for voicing her opinion about our President. So it leads towards the question, are our freedoms of speech being violated. Then there is the telephone taps that are being done on private citizens and how many people have been confronted by the FBI or Secret Service because of an statement they may have shared. I don't know if you read the Bible, but this is a prediction according to the word. That before the end of time our Government will rise against us, and then the mention in the word that man cannot lead man without destruction. I think we should wake up and act as this may be our last opportunity to do so. We have to learn how to do things in a more positive way and we have to demand accountability for those who do wrong. Yet we know this yet many of us are not willing to do or say anything, for fear of may occur. Yet we need to consider the alternative, what will happen if we don't?
2007-03-02 06:55:31 · answer #5 · answered by VLEEKS47 3 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Serious;
What various attacks are you referring to? The 9/11 attack did not just happen. Threats were coming in during the time Clinton was president - we were attacked when he was in office
What denial of torture? The only ones I see being tortured are terrorist or their supporters. The only thing President Bush is attempting (and doing one hell of a job at) is securing our freedom. So most dangerous, NO WAY!!! Dangerous to terrorist organizations -YES!
2007-03-02 07:01:42 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Nope Bill Clinton's. Full sale of nuclear secrets to Chinese, unexplained and questionable deaths of people associated or around him.
If you call putting panties on an inmates head torture perhaps you should look up Paul Johnson, or Eugene Armstrong beheadings. You could also look up people jumping out of World Trade Center to see what true torture is.
2007-03-02 06:51:24 · answer #7 · answered by True Patriot 3 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Seriously it is not. What are the various attacks that we are taking for granted? Have you been tortured? Have you lost your rights? You need to look a little deeper and further back in history before you start focusing on just one particular administration.
2007-03-02 06:45:09 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 10⤊ 1⤋
No, not when compared to FDR. Rounded up Japanese Americans,suppressed the media and dissenters,spied on people. Oh,and then there's Truman with the A-bombs. I admire those dems,don't get me wrong. Kicked ***. But,Truman also had Korea and started getting us involved in Vietnam with aid and advisors at the same time.
2007-03-02 06:50:23 · answer #9 · answered by bugeyes 4 · 6⤊ 0⤋
No
Like every other administration people thought was the worse?
It's like everyone thinking the end of the world is soon.
This is what we get for having a generation focused on some type of screen, television or computer.
2007-03-02 06:46:07 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 8⤊ 1⤋