English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Anyone?

2007-03-02 04:50:57 · 20 answers · asked by Cherie 6 in Politics & Government Politics

20 answers

Is this a sick joke? Clinton isn't deserving of that honor..

2007-03-02 04:58:06 · answer #1 · answered by . 6 · 3 1

Well think about it. Mount Rushmore was created in South Dakota . The project was undertaken because they wanted to increase tourism to that state.

Bill should not be there even though he might deserve a place because everyone will want a place there too. The carving ended in 1941 so you know it was depicting a 150 years of great presidents.

If Bill has to be somewhere like that it will take another 150 years and they will choose the best of men to be there. That way the people won't be alive at that time and less of a trouble from lobbying groups.

2007-03-02 13:01:39 · answer #2 · answered by Xtrax 4 · 1 1

Why can Bill Clinton never be immortalized on a mountain designed by a man who believed in white man's burden? A mountain that was stolen from the Lakota Indian tribe? A mountain that has the faces of a warmonger, two slave holders and a man that suspended Habeas Corpus? I guess he's just too tolerant. Bush probably qualifies though. He likes to steal, deny people rights and oppress others.

2007-03-02 13:17:11 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Wishful thinking dear. Bubba Clinton was one of the worst presidents ever.

Why would anyone want him next to the others at Rushmore.

2007-03-02 13:16:27 · answer #4 · answered by Duh 3 · 3 0

Because they arent adding anyone else. Its a national historic landmark and additions need to be approved by congress. That is EXTREMELY unlikely.

2007-03-02 12:56:14 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

He is a disgrace to this nation. Why immortalize an embarrassment?

2007-03-02 12:58:37 · answer #6 · answered by TRUE PATRIOT 6 · 3 2

Because liberal artist are to lazy to carve that big head.

Go big Red Go

2007-03-02 12:58:25 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Same reason Nixon can't...now how about a thumbs down for non partisanship, shall we?

2007-03-02 13:22:02 · answer #8 · answered by hichefheidi 6 · 0 2

No room on the mountain for a pot smokin, bj getting, terror avoiding, hippie.

2007-03-02 12:59:57 · answer #9 · answered by InTheWright 3 · 2 1

Aint that reserved for Publicans?

You have to have a head full of rocks to qualify.

2007-03-02 12:58:15 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers