English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-03-02 04:44:55 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities Philosophy

6 answers

Several.

2007-03-02 04:48:27 · answer #1 · answered by eagleperch 3 · 0 1

First, what society are you referring to when you say "our" -forget not that the world is on the web-site and even though this is English speaking, it could be the U.S., England, South Africa, New Zealand, Australia, etc. etc. etc. that you are referring to. But I will respond in regards to the U.S.of A. as that is the saddest society I know. It is repressed, does not take care of its people (unless they have money or fame), and has a very warped sense of what matters, of what humane priorites are, and of the world at large. Of course, there are exceptions to this rule and those of us who are the exceptions are very frustrated and disappointed with the direction that the U.S. society has taken. I don't know if I have answered your question, but there is limited space here for all that could be expounded on. So, my word would be sad, the context of the U.S. society is a sad one!

2007-03-02 13:24:47 · answer #2 · answered by ontheroadagainwithoutyou 6 · 0 0

The context of ever-changing...I'm sure that is not what you are looking for but it works for me. Our society is made up of different nationalities and beliefs and traditions. To put it in context would be saying it is a cornucopia of life.
I am probably philosophically challenged for this question.

2007-03-02 12:53:28 · answer #3 · answered by missellie 7 · 0 0

A Hedonistic Confederation ruled by a Timocratic Oligarchy!

2007-03-02 14:45:29 · answer #4 · answered by namazanyc 4 · 0 1

disorganised confusion

2007-03-03 12:07:55 · answer #5 · answered by al b 5 · 0 0

turbulent

2007-03-02 12:54:54 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers