English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Earlier today, I asked a question with regard to what is supposed to happen with regard to the insurgents when the U.S. pulls out of Iraq. Someone who said they were a conservative posted something like, "Don't you read the news? 12 people were kidnapped today."

Why is it that, when liberals bring up facts like this to point out the shortcomings of Bush's war, they're told that they're lying, or empowering the enemy, and yet, when a conservative does it to support his or her point, it's totally okay to mention the kidnappings and murders and death tolls?

Why the double standard, conservatives?

The conservative who answers honestly will be chosen as the best answer. I'm tired of rhetoric. Just be honest. Liberals - I already know that you agree cons are hypocrites. I want to hear from THEM.

2007-03-02 04:22:29 · 8 answers · asked by Bush Invented the Google 6 in Politics & Government Politics

8 answers

I am a conservative and here is my opinion on your question. I think that when someone has such a strong opinion on a matter, whether liberal, conservative, independent, communist, etc, they tend to utilize whatever information they have to further reinforce their original opionion. I can give you many instances when liberal arguments turn hypocritical. I think this is partially the problem with our state of affairs in general. This thought process leaves little room for compromise on issues. Liberals and conservatives need to come to terms that not everything they think is the absolute truth on matters. Surely, there are liberals and conservatives who could committ to at least admitting that they could be wrong on certain issues.

2007-03-02 04:32:14 · answer #1 · answered by tobcol 5 · 0 0

Years in the past, the ingenious party, and the Conservative party joined to develop into the ingenious Conservatives. a lot more suitable at the moment, the Reform party (which protected those who had damaged remote from the computing device's) joined, and the call began out because the Conservative-Reform Alliance until eventually the completed growing to be a member of, and then they determined on being only the Conservative party of Canada. Provincially, maximum Conservative activities are nonetheless ingenious Conservative. There are not any "good" hyperlinks between the provincial and federal activities, yet, they rather a lot all comprise an identical human beings. no longer like the u . s ., Canada isn't damaged into conservatives, and liberals. we've a third team, the socialists, who's party is the hot Democratic party. So, the NDP is on the left, the Liberals contained in the centre, and the Conservatives on the right. contained in the perfect Federal election, the Liberals were just about wiped out, and we've the Conservatives in ability, and the NDP as Her Majesty's dependable competition. there is also the Bloc Quebecois, who advocates Quebec putting apart from Canada. contained in the perfect Federal election: Conservatives 166 seats (fifty 3.9%) NDP 103 seats (33.4%) Liberals 34 seats (11.0%) Bloc Quebecois 4 seats (a million.3%) eco-friendly party a million seat (0.3%) 308 seats in finished.

2016-12-05 03:47:40 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

In your question, you ask what is supposed to happen with regards to the insurgents when the U.S. pulls out of Iraq, then you go on to say that you have presented some type of fact. I don't get it, or there was something else you said in your previous question. Anyways, The insurgents do not go away when we pull out. If we stay in until Iraq says we've got it, then we have the right to pull out. If we leave before then, then more than likely someone else in the region will try to over throw this young government. I'll put it this way. It's the 1st quarter of the Superbowl and you're team is up by a field goal. Do you pull you're starters out for the rest of the game, and let your second string play for the rest of the game? If you do, more than likely you will have to put your first string back in eventually or you will lose the game. If your second string however is trained to play as well as your first string then they can probably finish the game fine. If we pull out now without the second string up to par, our first string, or us, will have to go back and we will be behind at that point.

You also say that you are tired of the rhetoric, however you post is full of it.

2007-03-02 04:45:10 · answer #3 · answered by mbush40 6 · 1 1

First of all it's not "Bush's war", you guys seem to forget that congress voted for this war - please do not whine that Democrats were misled. Our military is doing so much more in Iraq then what is said in the media; building schools, giving school supplies, supplying water & food to remote areas. Maybe if liberals attempted to see the war in its true light instead of jumping on the President Bush bashing band wagon & actually form an opinion based on TRUE facts you would be taken more seriously. President Bush is not prefect; of course mistakes have been made, but take into consideration he did not make the decisions on his own. Most liberal statements are so filled with hate & absurd comments it's hard to get through the BS to the real questions. I have many liberal friends that I am able to talk politics without any name calling on both sides. I suggest for you to do what I do; do not judge conservatives by this site - the way I do not judge liberals by this site. I basically find it amusing the idiotic things people post (both sides). Take it for what it is, entertainment.

2007-03-02 04:48:08 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Both sides show this kind of hypocritical logic. When you are so convinced that your side is right, you lose sight of what is and is not a logical and reasonable argument for your view. Basically you become so emotionally attached to an issue that you lose the ability to rationally think about the issue. This is what happened in the answer given to you. Also, liberals are equally guilty of such hypocritical logic as well.

2007-03-02 04:31:26 · answer #5 · answered by msi_cord 7 · 1 1

Answers that are true or false are not based upon being conservative or liberal but upon strong study of the situation and integrity. You cannot blame every person in one group of having the same flaw.

2007-03-02 04:29:36 · answer #6 · answered by hannahloulou 2 · 2 1

Cons aren't just hypocrites. They are hopelessly mentally defective and will never be able to learn to think logically and rationally.

Never mind what they say or do. They are just making noise at the behest of their masters.

2007-03-02 04:30:15 · answer #7 · answered by chimpus_incompetus 4 · 0 3

DOnt worry about what and how cons think. Just slap them down and be glad that you can.

2007-03-02 04:28:08 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4 3

fedest.com, questions and answers