Ben Wallace who shoved Artest because he is a Sore Loser Shoving Action (just don't want to mess up his hairstyle kind of reaction) with his Pistons outplayed during that game by the Pacers or Ron Artest who has no loyalty demanding a trade from the Pacers?
2007-03-02 04:00:47 · 16 answers · asked by carol 2 in Sports ➔ Basketball
Artest because he has a all around game even though he can have a better offense but ben wallace cant even shoot free throws! :)
2007-03-02 04:42:41 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Artest is a better player because if he wanted to score 35 points, he is actually capable of doing that. Ben wallace on the other hand is only a good defensive presence, and he is growing old, as his defense starts to deteriorate. Artest though is 27, and can still keep the ben wallace level defense up for at least 5 years.
2007-03-02 13:22:05 · answer #2 · answered by Bodhi H 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wallace!!!!!!!!
Position Power forward/Center
Nickname "Big Ben"
Height 6 ft 9 in (2.06 m)
Weight 240 lb (109 kg)
Team Chicago Bulls
Nationality United States
Born September 10, 1974 (age 32)
White Hall, Alabama
College Virginia Union
Draft Not drafted
Pro career 1996–present
Former teams Washington Bullets/Wizards (1996-1999)
Orlando Magic (1999-2000)
Detroit Pistons (2000-2006)
Awards NBA Defensive Player of the Year (2002, 2003, 2005,2006)
2007-03-03 07:11:28 · answer #3 · answered by serbian girl 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ron Artest is the better player overall. He can score, defend, and basically play four positions on the floor. I would love to see Big Ben try to play point forward anyday. But who would I rather have on my team is totally different, Wallace all the way.
2007-03-02 12:36:13 · answer #4 · answered by J P 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ben Wallace by default. Although Ben's numbers have fallen over the past year I think Artest is extremely overrated.
2007-03-02 13:59:21 · answer #5 · answered by roni26 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hands down!! Ben Wallace better rebounder, shot Blocker, Defense and a all around Player. Artest is a little Crazy!!
2007-03-02 12:05:55 · answer #6 · answered by Coolbreeze 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Big Ben is not flexible. He can only help a team win when the team has many offensive weapons in their starting lineup. His lack of offense does not fit with a team without big scorers in their starting lineup. Artest fits everywhere, but his defense can not take over a game like Big Ben. Artest has great defense, but Big Ben stops centers.
2007-03-02 14:14:07 · answer #7 · answered by PearApple 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Artest all around, all the way, can ben wallace even shoot? artest is known for his defense as well, but who would i want on my team? if i had offensive fire power, big ben, to clean up the boards, but if i needed that second weapon id pick artest, dude is a freak...
2007-03-02 12:36:56 · answer #8 · answered by e-nasty 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Artest cause he scores more and Wallace is a better defender but not by much.
2007-03-02 21:14:28 · answer #9 · answered by Shamgod 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Artest all the way. He plays both sides of the ball. He creates his own shots, and he's a premier defender. What doesn't he do? He is unstabe but the questions asks who is better overall.
2007-03-02 12:10:18 · answer #10 · answered by dub see 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋