Because they do not realize that the world has changed, because they think if everybody plays nice there will be peace, because they have misconstrued the entire meaning of 'freedom of speech', because they are spoiled, insolent people who have no true loyalty to the Country. I would feel differently if they ever offered anything constructive but all they do is criticize and tear down. They don't realize we have an enemy who is out to take that freedom they abuse away from them, and then terrorize them and their families.
2007-03-02 04:49:13
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
no man or woman recalls historic previous. The "liberals" appease terrorists because they abhore conflict as all of us could. "Conservatives" imagine that we are able to win a conflict on the terrorists playing field. both are incorrect. traditionally, Neville Chamberlain wanted to assuage the Nazis to stay away from conflict. It did not artwork. The English tried struggling with the early "terrorist" individuals on their lonesome soil utilizing established conflict ideas. that did not artwork both. i'm afraid the in reality answer is to apply terrorism hostile to terrorists utilizing the efficient equipment we've reachable. As terrible because it type of feels, we favor to nuke the terrorists and each and each of the international locations that help them.
2016-12-05 03:44:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by duperne 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
In general, we don't. I believe someone lied to you when they told you this.
Do some crazies do it? Of course.
But, as a group, liberals are just against terrorism as conservatives are.
You, on the other hand, are clearly a poor American if you think that someone with an unpopular opinion should be kicked out. I may disagree with you, but I recognize your right to say it and believe it.
2007-03-02 03:50:24
·
answer #3
·
answered by Jay 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Probably it is because they are intelligent enough to realize that killing terrorists does not do anything to stop Terrorism!
It only creates more Terrorists like Bush has done over the last five years!
Lo Siento!
2007-03-02 04:15:02
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Liberal bedwetters ARE terrorists themselves. They want to destroy our country, just like the extremists want to.
ANYONE WHO SYMPATHIZES WITH A TERRORIST IS THEMSELVES A TERRORIST.
If Cindy Sheehan calls terrorists "Freedom Fighters", then she IS a terrorist, and should be declared an enemy combatant and hauled off to experience deluxe accomodations at Guantanemo Bay, courtesy of the U.S.A.
Yes, we have freedom of speech in this country. If what is being said may be a threat to national security, then it needs to be handled in an appropriate manner.
2007-03-02 04:21:12
·
answer #5
·
answered by Tiberius 4
·
1⤊
3⤋
Don't you see the irony in your question??? People who speak their minds in America "don't deserve the freedoms the soldiers are fighting for????" Just what are the freedoms they're fighting for then???
2007-03-02 04:48:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by jurydoc 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Conservatives are against the war too you know. In fact, at least 70% of the US are opposed to the war and want the troops home. Most of the troops want out of Iraq and Afganistan.
Only the brainwashed are supporting Bush and his fake war on terrorism.
GET A CLUE
2007-03-02 03:51:58
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
First of all, we have freedom of speech in our country. People can say what they want. Second, conservatives fuel terrorism by invading sovereign nations.
2007-03-02 03:45:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by KC Slim 5
·
2⤊
2⤋
It isn't about appeasing Muslim terrorists.
It is all about making Bush look bad.
They haven't caught on to the fact they want them dead too.
2007-03-02 03:50:25
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
why are mesianic neo cons determined to bring on armogeddon?
2007-03-02 04:47:56
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋