And have him drown all the terrorists?
2007-03-02 03:18:50 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
no......he is quite capable of getting himself drunk & our milatary certainly don't need his mouth over there. how about driving him off a bridge in ma. somewhere ?
2007-03-02 03:26:46 · answer #1 · answered by splaz57 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ted Kennedy become at fault for an vehicle coincidence in which his passenger (a lady named Mary Jo Kopechne) become killed. It wasn't seen "homicide" contained in the criminal sense. He wasn't even charged with vehicular manslaughter as he likely might want to were. He become got here across responsible (easily admitted guilt) to a unmarried can charge of leaving the scene of an coincidence which brought about damage or demise. He received a suspended sentence. of route there has continually been controversy and scandal encumbered gossip surrounding the incident....certain to be.
2016-11-27 00:09:40 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not that I support as such...but wouldn't it be more poetic to get Ted Kennedy drunk, put him in a car and send it off a bridge into a river and let him drown as he did his girlfriend?
2007-03-02 03:24:29 · answer #3 · answered by Blitzhund 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Absolutely
2007-03-02 03:23:13 · answer #4 · answered by ferengifighter 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Look, you fool, the Senator is over 80 years old and is one of 100 voices in the United States Senate. How can one man be so powerful that he scares the conservatives so much? Don't they have younger more verile Senators to speak on their side of the issue? Or, do they just wring their hands and say, oh well there is nothing we can do.
2007-03-02 03:25:46 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
You could do two drunks in a car: Teddy and Dubya.
2007-03-02 03:38:44 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm just trying to figure out why you think you'd have to get Teddy drunk, as if he isn't permanently pickled.
That bum hasn't been sober for over 4 decades.
2007-03-02 03:26:36 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
No, Iraq has enough deaths without uncle Ted behind the wheel.
2007-03-02 03:22:57 · answer #8 · answered by Sgt 524 5 · 1⤊ 4⤋
Norm thats an excellent idea!! Maybe we can send Shrillary over with him to play siren.
2007-03-02 03:23:51 · answer #9 · answered by Sane 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
You don't like Ted Kennedy because he is smart, wealthy, and powerful by respect and cares about the little guy.
Bet you like George Bush, though, who is wealthy, dumb, powerful by fear and force and cares about the wealthiest.
2007-03-02 03:28:29 · answer #10 · answered by Lou 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋