If Clinton was a better Redpublican than Bush by every GOP standard. Then why do RedsStaters bash Clinton???

Question

GOP Prosperity.

American aristrocrats enjoyed a 600% increase in personal wealth durring the Clinton years. But now they have only doubled their $$$ under Bush.

We all know the GOP is all about business wealth and personal tax free liberty. Clinton served the needs of America's wealthiest much better than Bush.

Bush seems to only serve the needs of the Huston Energy Cartel.

Who's the Best???

I like user Wolf's comitment to morality.

But it seems apolitical. Has there ever been anyone that ruled a people from any time in history that met the moral standard modern Americans ask for.

Even Moses was not allowed to enter the promised land.

Answer 1

Compared to Bush, Clinton was a Radical Fiscal Conservative.

Answer 2

Oy VEY !! Well, first your statement that: "We all know the GOP is all about business wealth and personal tax free liberty." is alittle off... As a California-Republican I want the Federal Government to stick to it's Constitutional duties... I despise Congressional / Corporate corruption, intrusion, and collusion.

So, though I'm "Red" in a "Blue" state, I disliked President CLINTON for his accepting $$'s from China, his failure to react (firmly) to International Terrorism, and his personal moral corruption... yet, as a member of the Navy, I followed his orders and supported those policies that affected me. I WILL grant that President Clinton could speak VERY well and could project incredible empathy and sympathy.

YES, I will admit that President G H Bush is out of touch with the working and middle-classes... he is a POOR orator and listening to him makes my teeth-grate with his delivery designed for a 7th grade history/economy class !!

Regarding the "wealth" issue... the economy cycles well outside the control or effect of most Presidential policies... the Dot.com wealth wasn't BECAUSE of Bill (or Al), nor was the burst because of George. MOST of the economic issues actually lay within the purvue of CONGRESS... notice how CAFE standards and the MA Bell laws of the 1980s disappeared under the Congress of BOTH Bill and George.

Personally I'd like to see a flat-tax that sticks it to the "idle-rich" alittle more... and also an abolition of the death-taxes for those with an estate UNDER 1 to 5 million dollars... and some application of anti-trust laws upon AT&T

Answer 3

Let's assume for a moment that you really want an answer, even though I think you are just trying to make some point.

Clinton disgraced the highest office of our country. His behavior was disgraceful whether you are republican or democrat.

Clinton sold technology and other information to communist China.

Clinton had ample opportunity to do something about Bin Laden.

The prosperity the American people enjoyed just happened to coincide with his presidency. His presidency was not the cause of it. Technology was the cause of it.

Bush has looked out for the people of this country without trying to look out for himself. Clinton was only worried about his own legacy.

6 years ago, the country rallied around President Bush because he was doing the right thing for the country, but after 6 years of constant bombardment by the liberal main-stream media has converted many people back to the liberal way of thinking.

Answer 4

Cllinton was NOT a better "Redpublican" by any standard and that is why the Red States are red.

Clinton benefitted from the economic policies enacted by his Republican predecessors and also the Republican Congress in control during most of his presidency. The economy tanked just as Clinton left office due to his policies.

Republicans are interested in moral values also, and as everyone knows, these are not Clinton's strong suit.

Answer 5

i detect the completed affair distressing, yet no longer fantastic contained in the least. I did figure that Bush would wait till the top of his tenure earlier doing it although. What distresses me maximum is that people at the prompt are not any more in a position to proper note of a criminal offense in this u . s .. Libby and Clinton both dedicated a similar crimes, yet like warring factions the Liberals and Conservatives are lining as a lot as shield their favorites. this is unhappy extremely. a criminal offense is a criminal offense and in case you commit one you need to be punished. extra contained concerning crimes like perjury there are not any ranges of severity. You both lied or you probably did not. the wider answer on your question is that both adult men (Clinton and Bush) are growing embarrassments to the american people and no i'm no longer chuffed. I concern that we will not in any respect back understand real integrity from our leaders and this is merely scary to carry close that people are comfortable with that see you later because this is someone voted in with the help of their chosen political celebration.

Answer 6

Bush will go down in history as on par with Lincoln, Reagan. Clinton allowed the international terrorists to gain a foothold with so much power that it has taken wars to push them down. Clinton allowed the US internal terrorists(enviros) to gain a foothold to destroy the country from within. Clinton's BJ's were his main interests.

Answer 7

I dont know how the largest tax increase in history and slashing military and intelligence funds is "redpublican" as you put it.

and the only reason the economy prospered is that the congress rejected Clinton's budget proposals for 2 years until he finally made the concessions the "redpublicans" wanted. topped with the Dot com bubble.

Answer 8

They will bring up his moral flaws, despite the fact that their current front runner for President was married to his cousin for 14 years

Answer 9

Because he was, and is, an adulterous p***k. and it's not about, "You're jealous because he got some and you can't"; it's a moral issue.I don't care if I won the lottery six times under Clinton, morals are all. By the way, I'm not a Republemming or a Democrap; I am a third party conservative.

Answer 10

Do you have proof, or is this your continuing propaganda. What you are saying is that Clinton is the reason we have lost the middle class. See when you say stuff on here you need some form of proof to back your BS up.