And how did he cover up his crimes? I hear liberals say that Bush is a murderer and in the next breath say that he is dumb. So tell me, who are these people he murdered and how was he able to cover up his crime?
Are liberals once again just spewing slander without using actual facts?
2007-03-02
03:06:55
·
15 answers
·
asked by
TRUE PATRIOT
6
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
Thanks for giving me proof of liberals just spewing slander.
Bush started a war? All by himself? Really? Could someone please tell me what war our President STARTED.
2007-03-02
03:14:55 ·
update #1
More proof?
"Lying about THIS AND THAT!"
Now THAT's proof for ya! Come on guys. Can't you do a little better.
2007-03-02
03:16:22 ·
update #2
Liberals don't deal in facts, they deal in emotion and repetition. They say it enough and therefore believe it.
2007-03-02 03:10:51
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
8⤊
8⤋
Interesting that you did not cite a source for your allegation. I've not heard this before. What I have heard is that the Bush Administration was warned that Osama bin Laden was planning to fly planes into buildings in August 2001 and apparently did nothing about it:
www.cooperativeresearch.org/project.jsp?project=911_project
What I have heard is that Bush accused Saddam of having WMDs, which has been disproven.
http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/meast/10/06/iraq.wmd.report
What I have seen is Bush making a joke about looking for WMDs at the White House Correspondent's dinner in 2004
http://http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_House_Correspondents'_Association#2004_dinner
What I have read is that general after general saying that the military is broken because of Bush's policies:
http://theage.com.au/news/world/.../2006/12/18/1166290447853.html
What I have seen is many people calling for his impeachment and conviction
http://www.impeachbush.tv
Please note that "murder" is not listed as one of the reasons to impeach Bush.
2007-03-02 11:28:28
·
answer #2
·
answered by KCBA 5
·
3⤊
1⤋
Bush murdered the innocent Iraqis.
Bush did not cover up the crimes; it wasn't his job. The job belongs to Bush's gang lead by Wolfowitz, his cabinet, the NeoCons and israel.
Whether Bush used his authority, or his chorts used Bush's authority to murder the innocent nation of Iraq and its people is irrelevant because, as Truman said, the Buck Stops at Bush's Desk and Bush is ultimately responsible. The beneficiary of this war is israel in terms of land and the US interms of looting Iraqi oil.
2007-03-02 11:34:07
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Well we are fighting a war we really never should have started and if we should have, the President and his posse should have taken more time and made more plans about it then just rushing on over there and making OUR MEN (one of my classmates!!!!! who did die in iraq) to Iraq which never really attacked us in the first place. We went over there and just started bombing and killing everyone. I know people over there and its sad, they say its the worst thing in the world.
And things are being kept from the american people, whether your republican or liberal the a$$holes in the whitehouse will never tell us certain things.
I spent some time in Europe and you should see what they think of America and our so called dear presiden!
2007-03-02 11:15:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by J<3R 5
·
4⤊
2⤋
Well, if you want to be technical about it, you could say that whatever number of troops have been killed to date, then there's your answer. His crimes?? How about lying to an entire nation about someone supposedly doing this and that in order to send our men and women overseas to get blown to hell and come to find out he lied all along???? Even some of his top aides said that after 9/11, Bush told his administration to look for "every way possible to put this on Saddam (Hussein)." I don't think that it's just liberal saying this; conservatives are starting to wake up as well.
2007-03-02 11:13:25
·
answer #5
·
answered by Jennifer C 2
·
3⤊
5⤋
You posed an intelligent point showing the non sequiter of radical thinking, and then completely convicted yourself of the same kind of vicious libel in the last sentence.
2007-03-02 11:15:48
·
answer #6
·
answered by Buffy Summers 6
·
5⤊
1⤋
NEW YORK (AP) -- A controversial new study contends nearly 655,000 Iraqis have died because of the war, suggesting a far higher death toll than other estimates.
http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/10/10/D8KM6GL80.html
Now go stick your head back in your hole. Nobody told you to come out, idiot.
When you force a country to go to war, then invade another country using false intelligence, and lie to the UN and the rest of the world, you are responsible. The bastard doesn't have the balls to kill anyone himself. He uses our soldiers as the instrument of death.
Facts? Which facts are we talking about you brainless wonders? The FACT that he lied to the world. The FACT that he invaded a country and is responsible for tens of thousands of deaths? The FACT that over 3000 of our kids have died for nothing? The FACT that Saudi's attacked us, not Iraqi's. The FACT no WMD's were ever found? The FACT that terrorist attacks have gone up exponentially?
Which FACTS are we takling about you idgits.
2007-03-02 11:14:10
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
5⤋
People believe Bush is a murderer because they believe he lied in order to commence the War on Terror. They believe he lied about the WMDs in Iraq, about the basis of 9/11.
Where are the WMDs? Where's Osama? Why did WTC 1,2, and 7 fall, yet no other steel-frame building fell before or since 9/11? How did jet fuel melt steel and create weeks-long burning pools of molten metal under the rubble? How did it pulverize massive sections of WTC concrete without the use of explosives?
2007-03-02 11:13:51
·
answer #8
·
answered by eatmorec11h17no3 6
·
5⤊
6⤋
He did not directly murder anyone. However, I suggest that the librals are probably referring to the thousands of innocent people killed in the illegal war in Iraq. Too many people make general statements and do not back them up.
While I normally side with the liberals I think I will give you the edge on this one. GWB did not murder anyone. He may have been partially responsible for events that caused the death of thousands of people but he did not directly murder anyone.
2007-03-02 11:13:07
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
6⤋
Liberals use facts sparingly, because very few facts support their views. That's why they overwhelmingly use emotional arguments and psycho-babble - which do not require factual support.
2007-03-02 11:19:16
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
They call him a murderer because he started a war that resulted in 1000s and 1000s of lives. And, yes, he's an idiot for not being able to admit that what he did was wrong, very wrong.
Cons...so hateful.
2007-03-02 11:12:17
·
answer #11
·
answered by Groovy 6
·
5⤊
7⤋