2007-03-02 02:18:37 · 13 answers · asked by Drama Queen FoxyFoxy V 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
Solo because he has done a lot of experiments that I don't see happening in any genesis era, besides his musical growth overpassed genesis ages ago... he is outstanding
2007-03-02 04:27:46 · answer #1 · answered by jljimenezs30 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
even nevertheless they have been the two super i could decide on Peter Gabriel. while Phil Collins took over they nonetheless made some super records like "Trick of the Tail" and "Wind and Wuthering". yet while Collins became a super solo famous individual, the Genesis records weren't as solid. additionally, Peter Gabriel's solo records have been far extra interesting than Phil Collins records.
2016-10-02 06:24:11 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Solo
2007-03-02 02:25:27 · answer #3 · answered by wackadoo 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Solom but it would be nice to have them all come back to new york city in say 5 years as Genesis for a weekend at the garden
2007-03-02 02:23:23 · answer #4 · answered by It's been awhile 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In Genesis.
2007-03-02 02:21:45 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Some of each, mainly solo.
2007-03-02 02:21:38 · answer #6 · answered by AF 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes
2007-03-02 02:24:45 · answer #7 · answered by Joe the God of Averageness® 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He is better solo
2007-03-02 02:21:22 · answer #8 · answered by jonah 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
solo artist.
2007-03-02 02:22:49 · answer #9 · answered by brock 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
solo
2007-03-02 02:21:28 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋