I'm sorry that some of my earlier Q's had a couple spelling errors. It was prolly the drugs.
The rethuglikkkan party has always been evil. We all know this. Has Bush moved this evil up a notch?
Lincoln was only very evil. Sure, he may have created the rethuglikkkan party, but he also gave us the black voter block.
Reagan was merely absolute evil. Despite being an actor, he didn't embrace the virtues of marxism. He even fought against it!
Is bush something even worse?
First he stole the election. Then he murdered millions of blacks in New Orleans. After that, 9-11 happened and he used it as an excuse to invade iraq and kill everyone there.
In total, bush has killed over 50 million people, many of them democrat voters. He has imprisoned and personally tortured many millions more......just for fun.
We must all unite against him. Not just people, but conservatives as well.
Has Bush raised our consciousness of the full potential of evil?
2007-03-02 01:56:57 · 13 answers · asked by mmm_billy01 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
I will award best answer points to whoever tells how evil bush is the best.
2007-03-02 01:57:46 · update #1
illyria you are completely right, anyone who smiles and shakes hands MUST be evil.
2007-03-02 02:34:29 · update #2
Your question lacks any form of intelligence. Do you really think that GW Bush is more evil than Saddam Hussein? Do you think that Republicans are more evil than Nazis? If so, then you really need to keep a drool bucket close at all times.
Bush has killed 50 million people, many of them Democratic voters? Where is your documentation of this? Please do not post a conspiracy website. Sheesh.
Stupidity leads to slavery, I suggest you read at least one book. And please no comic books or anything by Al Franken.
2007-03-02 02:05:02 · answer #1 · answered by Eric K 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I don't blame Bush for his activities. Because, Bush is doing only those things those he considers doing for the interest of himself and his party. Everyone did so when in power. So, why to blame only Bush? As he is the current one?
But history says that the Republicans are more focused on the economic solvency of the US by any means whether it is right, wrong, legal, illegal, evil or whatever is. In such drives, they don't bother to regard the rights and sovereignty of other nations, specially, the weaker ones as we can see now in the Bush
administration. As a result, perhaps, the Americans enjoy a bit better economy during the Republican rules but at the cost of worldwide instability and sufferings of the weaker nations, especially if they are rich with oil and minerals.
On the other side, Democrats focus on developing social rights and homogeneity. So, they needed less to make worldwide instability, intimidating and invading other weaker nations. If we go to history, we would see that clashes with other nations were more during Republican rule than that of the Democrats.
So, I would not say that Bush touched the pick of evils. Rather, I would say that Bush just increased the pace of the Republican 'arts' of ruling the US and dealing the world a bit more than others. Still now, the world has time to witness and experience some more classical arts of ruling and dealing the world by some more devine Republican saints.
2007-03-02 10:46:37 · answer #2 · answered by The Falcon 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Well folks, this is what the dumbocrats public school system gets us. Don't blame this poor soul. It's not his fault. As to the question of whether Bush has raised our consciousness of evil. He has certainly tried, but there are a lot of puny brains out there that are incapable of absorbing the message. He has pointed out that our enemy has no problem killing the most innocent among us to further their goals. They treat women (all women) like chattel. They behead people to spread terror. They send out their weak of mind with explosives strapped to their bodies (You'd have blown yourself to smithereens by now). They kill and then hide behind skirts and under school desks and hospital beds. All non-Muslim's (including, I presume, YOU) are slated for death in their backward, sixth century world. Yep, for sure, Bush has convinced me that they are pure evil.
2007-03-02 10:25:29 · answer #3 · answered by Knowitall 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He is an evil
He must be the biggest evil
Spending US money to kill civillians not only terrorists
And he masturbates in his office that cause his acethylcolin amount greater than his dopamine levels in his brain that leads to less cerebral cortex activity meaning less brain cause he already has half of a human brain so he should stop his sex life at least to remain some intellectual ability.
I think you are right about nine eleven .He used this unfortunate and sad situation as a political tool
I agree with you about New Orleans thing . He s a terrorist to . He does not like black people and let them to die . That s very sad . Everybody is equal in the earth no matter what their color are .
2007-03-02 10:04:52 · answer #4 · answered by xeibeg 5 · 0⤊ 4⤋
Anyone who can smile and shake hands and has no conscience of the people he is hurting is evil. Bush has NO sympathy at all for the familes who have lost loved ones in a war with no purpose so yes Bush has raised my consciousness of the full potential of evil.
2007-03-02 10:01:18 · answer #5 · answered by Lynnemarie 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋
No. The Islamofascists are trying to do that, but Liberals refuse to see the truth.
2007-03-02 11:00:43 · answer #6 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No! Only selective info is released....They don't want to get the people rowdy
2007-03-02 10:09:38 · answer #7 · answered by Simple1 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You forgot to mention global warming.
2007-03-02 10:14:42 · answer #8 · answered by Matt 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hitler would be jealous and envious, the Devil is proud of his offspring evil
2007-03-02 10:05:12 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
You blame your use of Drugs for you ignorance! We really do not need people like you on this site!
2007-03-02 10:00:11 · answer #10 · answered by Sentinel 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋