Imagine that.
2007-03-02 01:47:02 · 10 answers · asked by megalomaniac 7 in Social Science ➔ Economics
No; stupid people would **** it away in a week.
2007-03-09 18:29:42 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Economics is about incentives. What incentive would you give people to produce goods and services. Human nature makes one ask, "What's in it for me?" If people don't see they can get ahead, they have no motivation to contribute to society. What is the incentive to distribute things equally? What if I want more because I feel I'm entitled to more? I will take what I want. Then where are you?
Also, without wealth, there is no investment. Without investment there is no economic growth. How are you going to provide for econommic growth? If you have kids, you're going to need more jobs as population increases.
What do people do when their money is gone? Where are there jobs? It's not just about money. It's about incentives and human nature. How do you motivate people? How do you keep the lights on? That's why welfare failed to help people. They had no incentive to work and became a burden on society. I work because I can feed, educate, and take vacations with my family. I can retire with money in the bank. Give people eveything they need, and you can take away all their incentive to improve themselves, and society. Life is a struggle, it forces people to think and work together. It creates a better world.
2007-03-06 09:28:49 · answer #2 · answered by JimTO 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am noy sure I would distribute it equally but the fact that 90% of the wealth in the US belongs to 10% of the people is sickening.
2007-03-03 15:09:51 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
First thing first,it is not possible to distribute the wealth equally.To ma side i will direct the wealth to those who can work for it,as it is know that wealth is the stock of capital,then i will sent wealth to the place with adequate labour our,desired land and to those with entrepreneur abilities,because they can work and involve in the production for exchange,That is to say those how will be earning the wealth can work with those with nothing.
2007-03-07 20:11:45 · answer #4 · answered by Daniel S 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Media and track being relationship love and drama obsessed, human beings over become attentive to their problems with this way of track, is somebody fairly shifting on whilst their listening to track approximately their subject concerns? interior the 80's and ninety's track became approximately taking section in existence and residing the 2d, now majority of it fairly is the different and track has a super effect on human beings and cultures.
2016-10-17 02:28:31 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. The pursuit of wealth is one of the roots of competition and ambition. Without the carrot of something better, why bother?
2007-03-02 01:57:59 · answer #6 · answered by Michele H 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
what u are talking about is essentially the idea of utopia or communism. it is a great fantasy that has never come into reality. if once it did, it was crystal ball and would break so easily
2007-03-02 15:49:57 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No I wouldn't. I would only distribute it to those who would use it for good and those who were not lazy. I would reward those who deserve it and I wouldn't give one penny to those who are wicked or lazy.
2007-03-02 01:53:24 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, I wouldn't. There is no incentive to work hard! And what about people who are no good? I wouldn't want to give them anything!
2007-03-02 01:54:58 · answer #9 · answered by melouofs 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No.
2007-03-02 01:55:34 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋