I mean, I am all for adopting kids...but, she's got two adopted kids already, she just had a baby of her own a few months back and I just read in the news today that she's going to adopt a vietnamese baby....now, with her busy schedule, does she actually have time to raise the kids? or is she just adopting them and hiring nannies to care for them?
What is everyone's thoughts on this?
2007-03-02 01:36:41 · 9 answers · asked by j c 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Cultures & Groups ➔ Other - Cultures & Groups
Unfortunately, she's just getting started. She wants many children from different countries..... what in the world was Brad Pitt thinking when he left Aniston for this nut job?
2007-03-02 01:42:09 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I applaud her efforts. Whether they are being cared for by her or her nannies they are probably better off now than before.
They have someone to call mom and a place to call home. I don't know any perfect mothers, we all have flaws why should Angelina be any different.
2007-03-02 09:57:53 · answer #2 · answered by CURIOUS 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Remember Josephine Baker? Some women just want to save all the children of the world. She has the money for it, so why not?
2007-03-02 09:40:38 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
it's sad, but jolie is part of the trend known as "trophy kids" to be displayed
2007-03-02 18:21:47 · answer #4 · answered by thefedd 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Anyone that thinks she is stable is crazy! Wearing a vial of her brother's blood around her neck, um, perhaps not a well person.
2007-03-02 09:40:20 · answer #5 · answered by Jessica 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
It would be nice and o.k. If she would raise them !I feel bad for celebrity babies.
2007-03-02 10:43:23 · answer #6 · answered by lost2day 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
who cares, shes HOT
2007-03-02 09:42:14 · answer #7 · answered by sassbs2740 1 · 2⤊ 2⤋
That would make here a SAMILF.
2007-03-02 09:40:05 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
She's an overrated tramp.
2007-03-02 09:47:25 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋