2007-03-02 01:06:01 · 10 answers · asked by T-Bone 2 in Sports ➔ Tennis
oops, I mean Federer. I was just watching the Brittany downfall on tv.
2007-03-02 01:19:12 · update #1
No. It just kind of makes it borning. I'm tried of watching Grand Slams or events and already knowing who the winner is going to be. It would be cool just to watch an event and knowing that anyone has the opportunity to win, not just the same guy over and over again.
2007-03-02 04:36:30 · answer #1 · answered by december_chick_89 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
hahahahha lol....Roger Federline...not only can he play tennis, but he can bang brittany spears and produce horrible music!!
On a serious note, it may be good for the sport, b/c it will inspire other athletes to work really hard to try and take him down..thus, the sport will produce better tennis players and a higher quality of tennis will be played throughout! And every time you watch a Federer match, you can be in for a great upset if he actually looses.
2007-03-02 01:14:31 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
With Roger Federer dominating tennis the way he is at this time, it makes the other players elevate their game and play even better to try and beat him as well as other players. It is much the same way as when the Williams sisters dominated womens tennis several years back. Other women lifted their games to a higher level and won more tournaments. It does not hurt the game so much as it improves the play of the others in the same tournaments.
2007-03-02 04:00:08 · answer #3 · answered by Keith R 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Its Roger Federer, not Federline
2007-03-02 01:14:35 · answer #4 · answered by ALI G 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that when one person is dominating the sport, it makes the other guys better in the long run because they know they have to get better if they want to challenge him. He can clearly dominate almost everyone at the baseline so other guys have to start using all-court tactics to beat him and that makes it tougher for the other than Federer players initially. They are taken out of their confort zones and they might fail in the beginning; if they stick with it though, they should come out better on the other end. Many players, men and women, are afraid of doing this because they know what got them there and are afraid to lose it. But I still think that 1 great player helps the game. You have something to shoot for.
2007-03-02 01:25:43 · answer #5 · answered by daniel c 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No... A player like Roger FederLINE (hehe, I like that one) but, he will push future tennis players to step up their game to challenge him.
Some boy will say, "hey, I wanna beat this guy." and then he does.... and i'm sure lots of boys are thinking that... this is just pushing the sport forward... its great for the game!
2007-03-02 11:27:37 · answer #6 · answered by JanetB 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes, It has made ATP tennis a boring circuit coz every1 wants 2 see somethng new other than the same old swiss face. As compared 2 women's game it has become " Fed-ex centered" & he just wants to b the best of all times on the cost of tennis. His dominance has made ATP sick like it was when steffi graf & navratilova were but even then monica seles & others used to beat them so it wasnt that dominant But FEDERER must leave now.
2007-03-02 02:01:34 · answer #7 · answered by snehil s 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Did you mean Roger Federer? No, it's all competition. It inspires other people to surpass him.
2007-03-02 01:15:58 · answer #8 · answered by Dowland 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it is not roger federline it is roger federer
2007-03-02 03:29:12 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
He does not hurt the sport
2007-03-02 02:06:55 · answer #10 · answered by Yo 100$ (YUWL) (X-way ECW) 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋