English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Creatures
2 Dark Ruler Ha Des
1 Raviel
2 invader of darkness
1 mask of darkness
1 jinzo
1 exiled force
2 giant orc
3 giant germ
1 mobius
2 goblin king
1 sangan
1 night assailant
Traps
2 sak armors
1 ring of destructin
1 barrel behind the door
1 torrential tribute
2 magic jammers
2 threatening roar
1 riryuoki field
1 call of the haunted
1 spell sheild type 8
Spells
1 dimension fusion
1 double spell
1 monster reincarnation
1 premature burial
1 pot of avarice
1 lighting vortex
1 cost down
1 swords of revealing light
2 axe of despairs
1 united we stand
1 heavy storm
1 book of the moon
1 creature swap
1 giant trunade
1 noble man of crossou

I took all of lucius out to experiement......wow....ummmm......even faster......invader, ha des, and jinzo by turn 3. i locked the board...then someone tried to vortex so i book mooned my jinzo jammered and threatening roared. GG next turn.

2007-03-02 00:12:52 · 6 answers · asked by mr.godzilla888 2 in Games & Recreation Card Games

6 answers

Honestly not bad of a deck and I am positive it is very much functional but I have alot of cards I don't think is needed in this deck. I count 45 cards and it is almost always best to have only 40 cards unless you are runnning a gadget deck. Take out Raviel and the Invaders. Invader isn't that great since it requires 2 tributes and you only have 18 monsters and 7 of them are tributes so you need to take out alot of tribute. Anyway quickplay spell are common but only 3 are commonly used. Raviel is if remember on of the 3 sacred beasts and they all stink so you should take out as well. Add another Mask of Darkness seeing that now you could have 2. Add in a Snatch Steal seeing that it got recently unbanned. I don't see why barrel behing the door is here at all since it only work on cards that deal damage excluding attacks. 2 Magic Jammer is too much. Many of the pros dislike that card seeing that it requires you to lose 2 cards(The discard and itself) to negate one spell. Take one or both of them out for magic drain instead. While less reliable more crippling. Double Spell is not that great either although at first it seems to be great. It is extremely unreliable. Hope I helped.

2007-03-03 13:47:44 · answer #1 · answered by Lying from you 4 · 0 0

Looks like a good set up for a fully legal deck. I would give it about a 9 maybe 9.5 out of 10. Looks like it does pretty good together. Good luck with more wins.

2007-03-02 13:00:44 · answer #2 · answered by Chaos 3 · 0 0

Keep dueling other duelists to figure out the flaws in your deck. It's a powerful deck.

2007-03-02 14:24:45 · answer #3 · answered by golddwulord 2 · 0 0

Preety good although I think you could use more monster cards.

2007-03-02 16:22:55 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

You seem pretty good...

You should be giving me advice instead of asking for it...

2007-03-02 14:07:14 · answer #5 · answered by HONORARIUS 7 · 0 0

that nice but it seems you know what you are doing so yoou dont need my help

2007-03-02 10:52:56 · answer #6 · answered by bell 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers