when it comes to solving the problem in Iraq, many options are off the table (like negotiating with the insurgents)??
Why would the US not consider the obvious solutions? Bush's pride will get many more killed....
2007-03-01 23:17:06 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Tech:
I try not to make personal attacks, but your a moron.
If you kill a person by using a drill (which btw is propoganda) or pressing a button to drop a 1-ton bomb, that person still dies.
The US has tortured people and killed thousands...why are they not barbarians??
Your hopeless....
2007-03-01 23:29:42 · update #1
Because Bush is bent on war, I think that's obvious by now. It's f*ckin scary man.
To TechX69 (2 comments below me): You have been brainwashed by the propaganda my friend. How would you feel if another country invaded yours and tried to alter your values and customs to suit their own? You'd fight back! Just because you are American doesn't give you a divine right to do what you like. Not everybody has to act exactly as you all do.
2007-03-01 23:20:04 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I've always thought the pharse "We don't negotiate with terrorists..." was a very nice sound bite and not much else. Something a politician can use to claim that he is tough and a man of principal. Personally if I was being held by terrorists my damn government better be negotiating for my life, thank you very much...
The conflict between the Irish and Britain has lasted more than one hundred years and cost so many lives and what happened in the end? To really make any headway on solving the issue, the two sides had to sit down and talk to each other.
It wasn't as simple as just waking up one morning and holding talks. Both groups had to give up something, back down from some of their rhetoric, to achieve the kind of environment where communication can occur and common ground can be found.
And that's what I think is missing in the whole conflict between the Western nations and Israel and the terrorist organisations and Mid-east governments. Everybody on all sides ( not just the US) is righteously taking a "hard line" and nobody is willing to give a little.
And because a small group of people (politicians, activists, leaders, fighters) can't shallow a little pride, thousands of ordinary people die every year. And more and more angry young men are cultivated to carry on the cycle of violence.
2007-03-02 00:58:07 · answer #2 · answered by lokai1701 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
hi Lioness, i attempted to discover "objectified" and "objectification" interior the dictionary and no excitement. nicely, i'm not precisely confident I comprehend your queston, yet think of i might have an theory. besides, have you ever heard of the "bell curve"? that's a curve it fairly is formed like a bell and does an outstanding interest of representing information. As for elegance, at one end of the curve we've the least beautiful and on the different end the main. the comparable may well be genuine for earnings ... poorest on one component and richest on the different. interior the direction of the bell we've all the traditional human beings. i think of what you're asserting is genuine, yet in basic terms in basic terms a actuality of existence. we've the completed spectrum for the two genders. As for why adult men do not protest ... i assume they comprehend that it fairly is in basic terms the way issues are and protests at the instant are not liable to alter something. wish this facilitates!
2016-10-17 02:19:19 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Bush administration is happy to go into new conflicts because it takes attention from older ones. They'll wait for Bush to go and leave it to the Democrats, who I tip for getting in power this time. And when the Democrats try to tackle the problem and it blows up in their face, the Republicans will be happy that
A) it happened the the democrats, and the voters saw it, and
B) they escaped it.
2007-03-01 23:21:30 · answer #4 · answered by Bloke Ala Sarcasm 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Dont you forget that the Iranian government commits daily genocide against its Baha'i population....why should the West negotiate with the new Hitler? options are off the table because the West has learned you cant (and shouldnt) negotiate with madmen
2007-03-03 12:37:23 · answer #5 · answered by rihannsu 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Just how do you negotiate with a group that uses power drills for torture and then a be-heading. Not to mention blowing up chlorine tanks so many people are affected or killed. I just don't see how you would negotiate with , let's face it.....BARBARIANS.
2007-03-01 23:23:10 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Right ! Negotiate with "Terrorist's", now there's a brainy solution ! why couldn't the state dept. think of that ?
2007-03-01 23:27:09 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
yes it sure will.
2007-03-02 15:53:12 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
mmmmm.....................
2007-03-02 03:34:42 · answer #9 · answered by ILSE 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋