Has evolution of humans from apes been proved beyond a resonable doubt?

Answer 1

NO.


Its that simple...it has not. There is no proof beyond reasonable doubt...like it or not that is the truth. The so called "missing link" is still supposedly out there somewhere...waiting to be found..ha

Answer 2

No, and according to the concept of Scientific Process, it never will, because neither Biology, nor Paleontology, both of which are empirical sciences are not in the business of proving anything, but, rather exist entirely for the purpose of DISPROVING disprovable theories.

Whenever a new theory comes along, it is the job of every empirical scientist to try to disprove it, and then to find ways to explain the theories that cannot be disproven.

However, it is a proven fact that from the perspective of Microbiology, specifically protein comparisons, the hemoglobin of humans and horses are significantly more similar than the hemoglobin of humans and any of the known species of primates, and especially the Chimpanzee, which some beleive to be the Man's closest genetic relative among the species.

Answer 3

This is a complex issue and to understand it you would have to know a fair bit about geology, fossils, anatomy, DNA etc. But essentially there is little doubt that life has evolved over time. The main proof of this is the fossil record. That is there is little doubt that evolution has occurred, but there is some discussion as to how it exactly works.

Now when it come to humans, do we say that man evolved from lower forms of life in the same way as animals or did we suddenly appear on Earth in a spacecraft or there was a puff of smoke and hey presto, we were created?

Well the evidence also points to the likelihood that man has also evolved from ape-like animals over time. Of course there are gaps in the fossil record, there always will be, but the evidence we have to date indicates very strongly that we did evolve from other primates.

Answer 4

Humans and apes had common ancestors, which is obvious from anatomical and genetic evidence, also behaviour like tool use and the ability of at least some trained apes (eg Washoe) to actually read and use sign languages and symbols, and to understand simple sentences. I think an unprejudiced jury would convict. Personally, I believe that creationists are closely related to monkeys.

Answer 5

No, because the evolution chain of the human from apes structures could not been found in certain transformation stage. So it could be just a similarity, but not a comfirmed theory. There are even some professionals claim that human descend from aliens from outer space. Meaning we are aliens who descend onto the earth.

Answer 6

some human beings will on no account learn appropriate to the info of evolution, they'll in basic terms bypass directly to have faith that a spirit summoning elephants out of not something in an unexplained way is, for some imprecise reason, extra useful than the organic factors. "faster or later all human beings dies" Wow, how could human beings comprehend that without the bible? Ahum, wait a minute. I did.

Answer 7

No, as humans and apes both exist even today and we do not see any evolution in this regards. It seems just a fiction not a reality.

Answer 8

some will say yes, and some will say no , the puzzle of humans on earth still has giant holes in it , but with new discovery's being made all the time of humans much old then we thought possable, working and living together, beyond a reasonable doubt? i say yes. but with out the whole picture we may never know every change we have made from humanoid creatures living like pack animals, to modern humans. but all signs say this is the most reasonable answer.

Answer 9

Read up on the missing link. It is also the fundamental difference between evolutionist and creationist so even if the missing link is found there will be a dispute.

Answer 10

Can't happen. Unless there comes forth some kind of revolutionary discovery there will always be a reasonable doubt. Seeing is believing.