Why do you believe the official conspiracy theory regarding 9/11?

Question

I have heard plenty of good, valid and scientific reasons why people don't believe the official conspiracy theory regarding 9/11 (the one about 12 crazy Muslims outsmarting the entire US air force).

But I have yet to hear any good reasons as to why people support this theory. Have you actually read the 9/11 Commission Report, or are you just swallowing whatever your government feeds you without even looking into the facts?

Which one do you belive more: Your government, or the laws of physics as established by Isaac Newton?

Remember, no "pancake-theory" can explain a building (WTC 7) collapsing at free fall speed.

So how do you justify your strong stance against the laws of gravity? And if the government told you the earth was flat, would you believe that too?

That first answer is a perfect example of what I'm talking about. You call other people stupid, and yet you can't even put forth a proper argument? How sad...

Answer 1

The first response is the classic fire back of a wanna be debunker.

People like that also believe in the theory that the government has given them. He can give you no more facts then he asks for himself so his response is null.

I have read the 9/11 commissions report and it makes no mention of building 7 falling. The only study that does is the study released by NIST, which claims it doesn't know entirely if fire is what brought building 7 down.

The fact that all 3 of those buildings in New York fell STRAIGHT to the ground, and did not follow the path of least resistance, is reason enough for me to believe that something funny was going on that day. All 3 of those buildings had major damage on 1-2 sides but yet fell straight down. That would be like cutting a tree at the bottom and it not tipping over, instead, falling down on itself straight to the ground as dust / wood chips. It's not logical. Industrial steel does not melt and or weaken until it is exposed to temperatures in excess of 2000 degrees F for several hours, in most cases days. Many test done by NIST prove those to be true. The fact that these buildings burnt for roughly 18-45 minutes and fell is more of a conspiracy theory then anything else. I can safely say that it wasn't as hot as most stories claim it was, there were people clearly walking around in the holes of those buildings.

The resistance created by building 1 and 2 would not have allowed them to fall in 10-12 seconds. It would have been around 1 minute per building if the pancake theory were true. 9.86 meters per second ring a bell?

The first poster has probably not done any research on the topic so I wouldn't let it get to you. There are tons of questions about 9/11 the government refuses to answer. If they want people to stop questioning them, they should release everything. People have a right to know.

Answer 2

I think it's so funny that one can take a bunch of half truths and some out and out lies and make people believe in anything. How stupid do you have to believe in this kind of conspiracy? Then show me any facts.