2007-03-01 20:47:22 · 40 answers · asked by Richard M 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
yes he is the best president because he has made this nation a hegemonic power in middle east....which by the way all presidents before him failed to do...Clinton even admitted to trying and failing.
2007-03-01 20:53:16 · answer #1 · answered by Pro Bush 5 · 1⤊ 7⤋
I am no great authority on the past leaders of either the US or the UK but I am unable to think of a worse President than G W Bush or a worse Prime Minister than Tony Blair.
While America has always been somewhat gun-ho, most previous campaigns had some moral justification. Following the vast profits made from the first Gulf War, the US government has adopted war as a policy to syphon money from the US taxpayer to a few companies in the military supply and construction industries. Theft of other nations assets and destruction of their culture merely continues the American tradition that has its roots in the Wild West.
2007-03-01 21:08:04 · answer #2 · answered by Clive 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Oh, definitely!! He's so good. All the world's previous leaders pale in comparison. Taking money and benefits away from those pesky middle and poor Americans and giving extra benefits and tax cuts to those deserving millionaires and billionaires. He's also doing such a great job in Iraq and Iran.The world loves him and they wish he'd stay in the White House forever.
2007-03-01 21:13:48 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
The world does not have him, America does.He always strikes me as niave and possibly somebody elses yes man but I couldn't say who's ,not knowing a great deal about US politics.
Every leader has good and bad points.
Churchill was a great one for speeches and boosting moral but drank, was rude and not very popular with the population.
Gandhi was a great leader but not of the world ,only of India.
2007-03-01 20:58:15 · answer #4 · answered by marvelous_mad_madam_mim 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No, Winston Churchill was. He was a great wartime leader, rallied his people not to get disillusioned despite nightly aerial bombardments for several years, and finally warned Europe and the US about the "iron curtain" of communist nations leading up to the Cold War. He was a masterful man and statesman. Bush wouldn't be worthy of walking Winston's dog.
2007-03-01 21:15:22 · answer #5 · answered by gone 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No.Bush is not a world leader.But if you consider USA ,he may be one of the best presidents of USA.He was able to establish US supremacy over Iraq and Muslims.He was able to get control over oil resources in Iraq.He was able to prevent the sagging of american economy by increasing sales of arms.But these cost of lives of American army men and innocent Iraqis.
2007-03-04 21:40:03 · answer #6 · answered by leowin1948 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely not. Neoconservative Republicans will defer to Ronald Reagan as the greatest, paleoconservatives loathe Bush for his deficit spending, and any liberal or Democrat would never even consider the possibility.
If you don't like Bush, he sure isn't the best leader. If you do, most people will tell you Reagan was better anyway.
2007-03-01 20:52:24 · answer #7 · answered by BDOLE 6 · 5⤊ 2⤋
No. He foolishly entered a war that wasn't necessary in Iraq and attempted to democratise the Middle East prematurely and externally, which is a recipe for disaster.
2007-03-01 23:51:40 · answer #8 · answered by starepivos 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you think Mr. Potato Head would be a good Pres.!
Actually I apologize, Mr. Potato Head would definitely be a BETTER Pres.
at least Mr. P.H. has a good head on his shoulders, wait Mr. Potato Head ain't got no shoulders, he he
i believe DEVO defined "president" GW, jr. the best, when they prophesized his forecoming in this following music video entitled "Mongoloid", enjoy : )
http://www.youtube.com/watch_fullscreen?video_id=ZWmf7r_37eA&l=185&t=OEgsToPDskJne8hazjqYMcY58Twn8_8c&fs=1&title=Devo-Mongoloid
2007-03-01 21:50:43 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Worst Leader ever!!! Total warmonger that has given american and the american people a bad name. Not just that but he has put the american solider in a very difficult situation where, they must follow the orders and have to fight in a war where they don't know the reason and most don't agree with it.
2007-03-01 20:56:47 · answer #10 · answered by allentheone2000 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I was not aware that he was the leader of the world, have I missed something? I read somewhere that all great leaders, lead from behind!!!!
2007-03-01 20:57:13 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋