In a HEALTHY ROMANTIC relationship, it would have to be at least out of High School. The relationships I was in while in high school were puppy love. I got married when I was 20 and I am 23 and already getting a divorce, so I definitely would say out of high school and possibly after college.
: )
2007-03-01 20:34:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by Mommy To Be in April 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, I'm 20 and have only just got into my first real relationship! In my opinion, I am still too young to be settling down with 'the one' but there is nothing wrong with having a bit of fun first! He is not Mr. Right, more like Mr. Right Now, and I don't think there is nothing with that! If you have found someone who makes you happy and you enjoy being with them, whether you plan to be with them for the rest of your life or not, just go with the flow, enjoy life and don't worry what age you are! Just be happy and content with what you have, all the answers willl come with time!
2007-03-02 05:13:22
·
answer #2
·
answered by Me! 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
You want honesty, but you want to qualify your respondants. It DOES depend upon many things, but I think, chiefly the MATURITY LEVEL of the individuals in the relationship.
Younger lovers tend to make petty issues way out of proportion. Older couples look at a longer view and let much offense go. AND, emotional maturity and physical maturity DO NOT NECESSARILY go hand in hand, which is why many girls (who tend to mature earlier) go with older guys for their "first loves" leaving the younger guys frustrated. But, in the long run, things get evened out.
I suspect, early ADULTHOOD, (i.e. out of teen years) would be a minimum for healthy, and honest. Yeah the romantic part may start earlier, but the other two "virtues" are dependant upon less and less manipulation. Which, by the way, I believe women have a greater propensity for, early on.
2007-03-02 04:47:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think actual commited relationships start in college years, but i still think people should have romance in high school, not the kiddy love you told us not to talk about, but just one that (and this is going to sound bad) gets your feet wet, a practical test of romance.
2007-03-02 04:41:38
·
answer #4
·
answered by caliboy141414 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, most tend to find their first real love around the age 15-17.
The first real love doesn't mean it will be the last, or he one and only. For some it does. It worked for my grandparents, my sister, and it looks like it will for my daughter as well.
It didn't for me. However, I don't undervalue that first real love I had; it helped shape who I am, it was true and good and strong and lasted through a number of things for a couple of years. However, he just wasn't the one to be with forever.
2007-03-02 04:37:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think 22 is best becuase most people realise alot more about life by that stage.
2007-03-02 04:34:17
·
answer #6
·
answered by kalloggs40 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
You will know. Otherwise what is the alternative?
2007-03-02 04:39:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by eks_spurt 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
About now would be nice . . .
2007-03-02 04:39:26
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋