I have to laugh at a party who believes a word out of Gore's mouth . He has made countless ignorant , and downright bogus boasts & claims..yet they back the greatest , single hoax perpetrated on America-the Global warming spin . And liberals think because a science FICTION film he CLAIMS to have made , has credibility because of an award from HOLLYWOOD . ..Difficult to type while laughing hysterically ..
Money talks with Democrats ..They had another big dumb puppet in John Kerry . Gore & Kerry = Dumb & Dumber ..or..Lurch & Egore . If that sounds cruel - it is well deserved ; it's my country they run down and the United States Military they hate - is America's Military !
2007-03-01 17:23:24
·
answer #1
·
answered by missmayzie 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
This election will probably be the ugliest to date. I think that even the dems don't want Kerry. He proved to be an embarassment. I think that it is mainly the feminists who would actually want Hillary, I think that the dems know that she is not very likable and very divisive. Truthfully, I think that Gore will be their golden boy. He still has the crowd who are STILL whining about his "loss" in 2000 so there will be a lot of sympathy votes,and now with his Oscar for the issue of the day, global warming, and maybe even a Nobel Peace Prize, he will have those who consider him a genius, so he will get that vote, which looks like it could be huge.
I think that it will also be really interesting just how big a part a candidates military service is an issue or NON issue this time around, guess it will all depend on who their candidate is.
I for one am glad that Gore wasn't the president when 9/11 happened, and in reality I bet he is too. I wish Kerry would move to France.
2007-03-01 21:06:40
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
any mainstream presidential candidate that gets elected will bear the exact same results. The two parties have teamed up against the American people. Its a scam. republicans get 8 years, then democrats get 8 years, then republicans again, and so on.
solution: don't vote for anybody that the big media corporations promote, or talk about on a daily basis. any candidate that would actually be good for america would not be given any attention.
RON PAUL for PRESIDENT 2008!
2007-03-01 17:53:24
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I thought Al Gore would have made a decent President. However, I admit fully that it was a mistake to nominate Kerry in 04. the coming elections are going to be interesting. It is heating up for Hilary and Obama and we are a full year away from any of the real action.
2007-03-01 17:11:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by phoenixbard2004 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
I advise that the better decrease for contributions be performed away with, and that the optimum payouts in retirement nevertheless proceed to be as they are, adjusted for inflation. Social risk-free practices isn't a "provide away" software yet one that all of us make contributions to love a cost savings plan, and could be shielded from different makes use of by potential of the government. Do you compromise or disagree and why? in case you're so worried approximately it then why do not you; first positioned it returned into the internal maximum sector and make to have been no can take out money from it for their own interest, 2d pay returned each and every penny you have borrowed from the two Social risk-free practices and Medicare, third take the unlawful immigrants off of it and people who come over here yet on no account paid a penny to it, and ultimately have it the comparable for each individual; in different words government officers are to take part in it and in the event that they want something extra they do it on their own without the tax payers investment it?yet, the economic stytem feeding the imbalances had on no account been fairly replaced. They, a team of pupils, mentioned that each and every person expenditures of interest may well be 3% or much less for each individual to alter into rich if wanted (which could be genuine additionally to taces). the wonderful economic undertaking may well be, they mentioned, whilst there have been no expenditures of interest. Why not try this answer? the rich might nevertheless be rich. My question is: whilst soial risk-free practices will become a undertaking related to federal money owed, why not artwork with a balanced or earnings funds and spend no extra desirable than is available in, as any kin has to try for? Why not ban all loobying presents as a fashion to get rules that serve the country? God bless u.s..
2016-10-17 02:00:57
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
You wish it were that simple.
Knowing that Joe Liebermann almost became the Vice-President takes my cake.
Republicans today are involved with a prominent first--It's the only time in history when the rats are actually swimming TOWARDS the sinking ship. The more they try and disrupt the actions of the (D)'s through filibusters and vetos--the more their inability to be a cohesive entity to excise governance is auditioned to the public. Obviously they seem to think that Nov. 7th was some kind of setback. Good--let em. Cohesiveness does not mean that they are supposed to vote party line--it's a matter of compromise with the other side to get something done. And so far--they have acted like the Big Business spokesmen they always have. Too bad Big Business isn't the largest voting block!!
2007-03-01 17:30:05
·
answer #6
·
answered by scottyurb 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
What is really frightening is that the Demonrats are not scared by the likes of Algore, Hanoi John, and Hitlery Clinton Who else do they have? The hairdo from North Carolina and the empty suit from Illinois?.
2007-03-01 18:13:12
·
answer #7
·
answered by mourning my dad 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
The ex vice President Al Gore and Senator Kerry are welcome by my Party. Good news Ex President Al Gore is nominate for a Noble Prize and I am sure he will win. Senator Kerry are doing fine and I still not understand why he has to run in my personal opinion, he has so much money to spend and plenty of recognitions.Wow they are great men for the American.
2007-03-01 19:36:01
·
answer #8
·
answered by ryladie99 6
·
0⤊
3⤋
the democrats continue to concede the white house by giving us unelectable candidates.bore gore? hanoi john? we'll see what happens in '08, but I suspect Guilliani will be the best Democratic candidate. lol
2007-03-01 17:24:56
·
answer #9
·
answered by CaesarsGhost 3
·
4⤊
0⤋
The two of them are the #1 things that lost the Democrats two bids of that office
2007-03-01 17:13:06
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋