fragment, run on sentences and complete sentences.?

Question

1. In those days, Normandy was a small dukedom, today it is a region of France.
2. This magnificent work tells the story of the invasion.
3. The tapestry is 231 feet long, it is only 20 inches wide.

Answer 1

1. In those days, Normandy was a small dukedom, today it is a region of France. (run-on)
2. This magnificent work tells the story of the invasion. (complete)
3. The tapestry is 231 feet long, it is only 20 inches wide. (run-on)

Details
1. In those days, Normandy was a small dukedom, today it is a region of France. (This is two sentences side by side without correct punctuation. You could correct it by inserting a semi-colon or by a comma and a conjunction.
In those days, Normandy was a small dukedom, but today it is a region of France.
In those days, Normandy was a small dukedom; today it is a region of France.
)
2. This magnificent work tells the story of the invasion.

3. The tapestry is 231 feet long, it is only 20 inches wide. (run-on)(This is ALSO two sentences side by side without correct punctuation. You could correct it by inserting a semi-colon or by a comma and a conjunction.

The tapestry is 231 feet long; it is only 20 inches wide.
The tapestry is 231 feet long, but it is only 20 inches wide.

Answer 2

A sentence, to be finished, calls for a topic and and verb. If both of those aspects is lacking, the end result's a fragment. If one or both one among those aspects is repeated and not using a clause or ideal punctuation, the end result's a run-on. we can use this (albeit overly simplistic) premise to study each and each sentence. "IV placed with some fluid given for rehydration." (for that reason, the topic does no longer accept as true with the verb, notwithstanding both aspects look at the starting up look to be presence. it really is a fragment. the right thanks to say this can be "The IV became placed...") "section became lower back thoroughly irrigated." (for that reason an editorial is lacking. it isn't a fragment, notwithstanding it really is grammatically incorrect. The corrected sentence ought to state: "the realm became...") "wakeful, alert lady, in no acute respiration misery yet grimacing from soreness in her ankle." (This sentence fragment is lacking a verb. What became the wakeful, alert lady doing?) "affected individual given community anesthesia and placed on the operating table." (that is yet another fragment which will be fairly remedied with the inclusion of a assisting verb and article: "The affected individual became given...") "Electrocautery used to receive homeostasis." (This fragment is likewise lacking a verb. "Electrocautery became used..." would appropriate it.) "continual obstructive pulmonary affliction, congestive heart failure." (it really is a descriptive fragment lacking both subject and verb. To whom does it refer and what's occurring for this reason?) "His chest became sparkling to auscultation and percussion, his heart fee became wide-spread." (it really is a run-on that ought to fairly be remedied with the inclusion of a semi-colon or conjunction. for instance: "...percussion; his heart..." or "...percussion and his heart...") "Care became taken no longer to injure the nerve." (This sentence is sweet, notwithstanding interior the passive voice.) I absolutely have one caveat, notwithstanding, to the corrected examples I grant. It appears like this technical/medical notes. in this context, % and performance count number more suitable than grammatical correctness. hence, in this particular context, finished sentences would no longer be required by the expediency of the topic.

Answer 3

1) run-on
2) complete
3) run-on

Answer 4

I don't see anything wrong with those.