WWE isn't history for sure.they still have the stars, the matches , the live events.It's all about the personalities & feuds & the history of it all eg the "attitude" era of the 90's.they will always be the top dogs.
TNA won't take over either.The big disadvantage they have is it's confined to Florida & so TNA isn't on the road.They don't have the same funding or tv exposure either.So they don't get the same publicity.They get the stars WWE don't want & push them eg Christian & Kurt which is good.TNA have good individual stars like AJ Styles & Abyss.Their let-down is having has-beens like Steiner & Nash on the roster.
Neither are competitors.WWE & TNA co-exist as individual brands, both are just as good as the other.
2007-03-01 15:34:41
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
No, WWE is far from over. Although TNA has some great talent, most of their greater stars are not all-around talent. The ones that are good on the mic aren't great in the ring. The ones that are fantastic in the ring, either can't talk or simply aren't versatile enough to play heel and face ( A.J. Styles). This, of course, makes the character lose depth. While this is acceptable for some fans, the sad reality is: more fans prefer charisma over in-ring ability. The WWE does have a large quantity of talented individuals, but more importantly, they have wrestlers (Randy Orton) who are actually so good at being an engaging character that it masks how inadequate they are in the ring. Essentially, when TNA surfaced, fans that cared more about the wrestling jumped ship. This is what caused the WWE's loss of value (From over a billion down to 700 million). However, TNA is now, not only, picking up, but also, pushing, the "trash wrestlers" that WWE has passed on (Scott Steiner). This is causing TNA losses of its' fan base. TNA has some good talent, but (perhaps unfortunately) with the WWE's talent of creating well-rounded superstars, TNA may continue to grow, but it will not take down Vince's Powerhouse.
Note: I watch all the wrestling I can and currently prefer Ring of Honor above the others (although they are starting to fall into TNA's errors) so rest assured this is a unbiased comparison.
2007-03-01 15:26:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
What gets me is the attitude of you can either support TNA or WWE not both. Its not as if you watch Corination Street you cant watch Eastenders is it and at the end of day soaps and wrestling are scripted. TNA is more wrestling based than WWE true but WWE is a global brand whole TNA stays mostly in Florida if TNA ever hopes to catch up with TNA it need to get on the road to build up its fan base
2007-03-02 04:17:51
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well TNA is cutting edge original action and has achieved a lot over a very short time but everyone knows when WWE had trouble with WCW they fought back and became even better but that was partly because of stealing ideas from ECW and now minor companies like ROH, CZW, and all the Japanese companies have much more exposure because of the Internet and TWC Fight so that's not really an option but TNA has recently hired the new Booker Vince Russo (the idiot who ruined WCW) so there you go, there's the facts decide for yourself.
2007-03-02 06:08:19
·
answer #4
·
answered by Scotland Forever 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
WWE have & make too much money to be over.
TNA constantly run at a loss, they would need to expand dramatically to take over as the number 1 company.
I watch WWE for the storylines, TNA for the wrestling
2007-03-02 01:10:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by Chong 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Try to understand, because the two programs don't compete against each other WWE will never kill TNA nor will TNA take over WWE.
2007-03-01 18:06:28
·
answer #6
·
answered by no more heroes 2001 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
WWE is history, TNA is taking over
2007-03-01 16:07:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by katie d 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
wwe is at the top and it will stay there for along time, tna is still developing and it will take along time to reach the top. But with the money wwe has it will buy tna out and many of its superstars will go to wwe, aj styles is the obvious option
2007-03-01 20:37:29
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Whats TNA? no, only joking, dont think WWE will be history anytime soon, its been around for years, I hardly ever hear anything on TNA..its almost like amateur wrestling.
2007-03-01 21:59:48
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
quite a few the skills might the two be out of a activity or pushed to NXT or OVW. a pair of the present suited TNA adult men like AJ kinds, Abyss, The Dudley's, Jeff Hardy, Bobby Roode, Kurt attitude and Austin Aries might bypass after the titles just about promptly away or be interior the main experience. A earnings that should come of this may well be a extensive revamping of the tag team branch nonetheless, i propose they had have quite a few greater desirable skills that mandatory something to do. The knockouts might fall into nothingness, like maximum WWE divas in recent times - irrelevant. yet as long as Vince is in cost he'd probable bury maximum of them. And while you're questioning.... No Sting does no longer be on the roster, he refuses to artwork for Vince McMahon.
2016-11-26 23:21:33
·
answer #10
·
answered by vidrine 3
·
0⤊
0⤋