What is the deal with this BBC report?

Question

The BBC reporter is saying building 7 has collapsed with the building STILL STANDING RIGHT BEHIND HER!

God bless her she is british, so how could she know what building it actually is?

Please watch the whole video. http://www.documentaries.ws/1/news.php

Answer 1

In the video, the frame were they show the caption:

10:00 BST (London)
5:00 EST (New York)

is wrong. BST in London stands for their daylights savings time, while EST in America stands for Eastern Standard Time.

If it is 5:00 EST in New York, then it would really be 6:00 EDT since New York uses Eastern Daylight Time until well after September 11.

Therefore, the report is being shown at 6:00 p.m. New York time, and the building had already collapsed.

Let's see, which one is more likely. That someone screwed up interpretating or explaining the time difference between the two cities or that someone was so good as to pull off this entire event and then forgot to wait long enough before "announcing" that the building 7 had collapsed.

What type of person would plan this scale of event and then print or hand out information that could link them to having foreknowledge of the event? Surely, you can see that no one would ever do that and this must be some type of error on the time. They would have known that thousands of reporters would be watching. The belief that they would need to release any details to be sure the story was reported is completely asinine.

So, think for yourself. Don't just swallow everything that you read or see on the internet.

Answer 2

The BBC explanation is that the reporter is broadcasting live in front of a blue screen and the scene in the background is earlier footage so building 7 still standing was nothing more than a rather embarrassing oversight. An entirely reasonabe explination IMO.
However immediately after that explanation more video emerged showing a reporter behind his desk in the UK reporting that 7 had collapsed with a time ticker on screen registering the broadcast as being nearly 30 minutes before the collapse.
BBC when confronted with this anomaly has responded that they are unable to either confirm or deny in that they have "lost" all of their video aired within this time frame.
The BIG news here is that BBC now claims to have lost the video of the most important news events since WW2.
CNN, CBS, NBC,MSNBC, and FOX are all perfectly aware of this story, NOT A PEEP ??!!!
We get car bumpers, bad case of hickups , tents being set up in preparation for Anna Nichole Smith memorial service and a locomotive that bumped into a dumpster and wedged it against a near by building.

Another anomaly, neither of the links I provided are the time stamped broadcast that I initially was privileged to see but that link has been pulled as well as a repost of the same broadcast provided by Prison Planet, the first link below doesn't name the building that has collapsed and the format of the time line on the second link seems suspect to me by comparison to the link that has now been pulled and I cannot find.
In fact in entering Yahoo Search “ BBC building 7+ channel 24 “ many of the links provided to time stamped footage have been pulled and are no longer accessible. So go figure.

Answer 3

Let's see, there's 2 video clips from BBC, one where the reporter is clearly reporting that building 7 has collapsed beforehand, and in the background it's still there. Most people would argue the time zone difference or no time printed, but the main point is that they reported it collapsed when it was clearly standing.

The second report is done showing what time it is @ 4:54pm EST saying Building 7 has collapsed.

The 3rd was from CNN, where there are policemen and firefighters telling others to stand clear that the building is coming down, there's bombs in the building it's coming down.

All in all, the HUGE SMOKING GUN of it being an inside job. Remember no steel structure has ever collapsed from fire. And I just read earlier that the design features of building 7, included the ability to have multiple floors removed without sacraficing strutural integrity. But don't believe me, do the research.

Answer 4

Being a Britisher she was not very familiar with the Manhattan sky line and as she said that whole area has been cordoned off she was just telling what she has been told by the Authorities.I am sure if she would have been familiar with the World Trade Center area she would have never said that while standing literally in front of Solomon brothers building.

Answer 5

Crazy isn't it, they had to be told that the building was going to collapse.

Answer 6

Wow! That is conclusive proof that it was a conspiracy! From now on I am going to do whatever the eurotrash flavor of the month tells me to do!

Answer 7

She should worry about the terrorists in her own country(7/11). Oh I forgot,she's with them.